Le Thursday 28 October 2010 03:20:37 Ludovic Andrivon, vous avez ?crit :
...
>
> Hi Stef,
>
> Of course you can send me your scripts.
> I will try to get something out of those logs then.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ludovic
Hello,
here are the scripts. I have tested and modifi
Le 2010-10-27 09:21, stef a ?crit :
> Le Wednesday 27 October 2010 06:15:07 Ludovic Andrivon, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a Canon Lide 80, I switch to linux in 2007 and subscribe to this
>> list in 2008...
>> So when I need to scan i have to start a virtual machine with windows XP
Le Wednesday 27 October 2010 06:15:07 Ludovic Andrivon, vous avez ?crit :
> Hi,
>
> I have a Canon Lide 80, I switch to linux in 2007 and subscribe to this
> list in 2008...
> So when I need to scan i have to start a virtual machine with windows XP
> because this scanner is listed as unsupported.
Hi,
I have a Canon Lide 80, I switch to linux in 2007 and subscribe to this
list in 2008...
So when I need to scan i have to start a virtual machine with windows XP
because this scanner is listed as unsupported.
Since 2008 I learn a few things and may be I can help making this
scanner as suppo
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 15:42:12 Reinhard Biegel wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12. February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote:
> > > Register 0x6b is very different between GL841/2 and GL843. But the
> > > documentation around the pins controlled with 0x6b is a bit lacking.
> >
> > So we need to write reserved
Quoting Pierre Willenbrock :
> Stefan Lucke schrieb:
> > On Monday 11 February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> >> Reinhard Biegel schrieb:
> >>> Am Monday, 11. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke:
> >
> At that moment, I guess you'll see messages like:
> new high speed USB device using
Stefan Lucke schrieb:
> On Monday 11 February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
>> Reinhard Biegel schrieb:
>>> Am Monday, 11. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke:
>
At that moment, I guess you'll see messages like:
new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address nn
via dmesg.
On Tuesday, 12. February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote:
> > Register 0x6b is very different between GL841/2 and GL843. But the
> > documentation around the pins controlled with 0x6b is a bit lacking.
>
> So we need to write reserved I/O bits, (0x6b) need to write to undefined
> gamma addresses (0x5b/5c
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 10:24:51 Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> Gerhard Jaeger schrieb:
> > On Tuesday 12 February 2008 03:41:49 Reinhard Biegel wrote:
> >> On Monday, 11. February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> >>> Did someone post the bcdDevice value of a LiDE 80? GL841 goes up to
> >>> 3.0.5
On Monday 11 February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> Reinhard Biegel schrieb:
> > Am Monday, 11. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke:
> >> At that moment, I guess you'll see messages like:
> >>new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address nn
> >> via dmesg.
> >
> > Hi,
> > Yes, thats
Gerhard Jaeger schrieb:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008 03:41:49 Reinhard Biegel wrote:
>> On Monday, 11. February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
>>> Did someone post the bcdDevice value of a LiDE 80? GL841 goes up to
>>> 3.0.5, as someone said, and GL842 begins with 3.0.6
>
> that was me. But it's
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 03:41:49 Reinhard Biegel wrote:
> On Monday, 11. February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> > Did someone post the bcdDevice value of a LiDE 80? GL841 goes up to
> > 3.0.5, as someone said, and GL842 begins with 3.0.6
that was me. But it's not quite clear. got also some
On Monday, 11. February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> Did someone post the bcdDevice value of a LiDE 80? GL841 goes up to
> 3.0.5, as someone said, and GL842 begins with 3.0.6
bcdDevice of mine is 0302.
Reinhard
Reinhard Biegel schrieb:
> Am Monday, 11. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke:
>>> ...
>>> [genesys_gl841] reg[0x6b] = 0x02
>>> [genesys_gl841] reg[0x6e] = 0x6d
>>> [genesys_gl841] gl841_bulk_write_register: failed while writing command:
>>> Invalid argument
>>> scanimage: open of device gen
Am Monday, 11. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke:
> > ...
> > [genesys_gl841] reg[0x6b] = 0x02
> > [genesys_gl841] reg[0x6e] = 0x6d
> > [genesys_gl841] gl841_bulk_write_register: failed while writing command:
> > Invalid argument
> > scanimage: open of device genesys:libusb:001:010 failed:
On Monday 11 February 2008, Reinhard Biegel wrote:
> > > You are talking about writes like:
> >
> > I guess YES.
>
> Yes, I do.
>
> > Now I found the right one AND the right time: Before doing the reset ;-).
> >
> > So now I've the initial motor movement with LED blinking and a scan
> > movement
> > You are talking about writes like:
>
> I guess YES.
Yes, I do.
> Now I found the right one AND the right time: Before doing the reset ;-).
>
> So now I've the initial motor movement with LED blinking and a scan
> movement with green LED.
>
> But no (strange) data arrives.
I tried your diff,
On Saturday 09 February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote:
> On Friday 08 February 2008, Reinhard Biegel wrote:
> > Am Wednesday, 6. February 2008 schrieb Reinhard Biegel:
> > > Ohi just remember there was something that had to be called at any
> > > price but didn't find any documentation about that. I
On Friday 08 February 2008, Reinhard Biegel wrote:
> Am Wednesday, 6. February 2008 schrieb Reinhard Biegel:
> > Ohi just remember there was something that had to be called at any
> > price but didn't find any documentation about that. I'm going to look for
> > that in my logs.
>
> Hi again,
>
Am Wednesday, 6. February 2008 schrieb Reinhard Biegel:
> Ohi just remember there was something that had to be called at any
> price but didn't find any documentation about that. I'm going to look for
> that in my logs.
Hi again,
I wanted to capture some logs today. But I had to find out that
Stefan Lucke schrieb:
> On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> (more text inline)
>>
>> Stefan Lucke schrieb:
>>> On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote:
Hi,
I've seen there is some progress on lide 90 and I want to step in and
like
Am Wednesday, 6. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke:
> Do you have some old sources of your changes ?
>
> Playing with motor settings doesn't make a difference (at the moment).
Sorry, I trashed the sources because I messed something up and then nothing
was working any more. I planed to start ove
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> (more text inline)
>
> Stefan Lucke schrieb:
> > On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've seen there is some progress on lide 90 and I want to step in and
> >> like to ask if there could be d
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Reinhard Biegel wrote:
>
> Am Wednesday, 6. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke:
> > Even with turned off LED and some motor sound (movement in the wrong
> > direction ??), scanimage produced some pnm files.
> >
> > To be continued, but I really need some help, as I'v
Hi Stefan,
(more text inline)
Stefan Lucke schrieb:
> On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've seen there is some progress on lide 90 and I want to step in and
>> like to ask if there could be done something for my LiDE 80 too.
>> I cloned the canon_lide_60_model entry
>
Am Wednesday, 6. February 2008 schrieb Stefan Lucke:
> Even with turned off LED and some motor sound (movement in the wrong
> direction ??), scanimage produced some pnm files.
>
> To be continued, but I really need some help, as I've no idea
> about scanner hardware.
Hi,
I played around some tim
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen there is some progress on lide 90 and I want to step in and
> like to ask if there could be done something for my LiDE 80 too.
> I cloned the canon_lide_60_model entry
>
> -- scanimage with debug messages : --
> [sanei_debug] Se
Hi,
I've seen there is some progress on lide 90 and I want to step in and
like to ask if there could be done something for my LiDE 80 too.
I cloned the canon_lide_60_model entry
-- scanimage with debug messages : --
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of genesys to 255.
[genesys] SANE Genesys backe
Hi,
I've seen there is some progress on lide 90 and I want to step in and
like to ask if there could be done something for my LiDE 80 too.
I cloned the canon_lide_60_model entry
-- scanimage with debug messages : --
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of genesys to 255.
[genesys] SANE Genesys backe
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20061022/be51b81a/attachment.html
From terren...@ak.net Mon Oct 23 01:04:03 2006
From: terren...@ak.net (terren...@ak.net)
Date: Mon Oct 23 01:04:31 2006
Subject: [sane-devel] Attempting HP5200
Aaron Lawrence schrieb:
> Hello all,
>
[...]
>
> I used the awk and perl script on http://john.daltons.info/lide60/ to
> generate some output of plugging in the scanner, initializing and a
> 300dpi color scan. It was a while ago when I took the usb log but I
> believe I canceled the scan partway
Hello all,
A while back I attempted to make some headway with getting the Canon
Lide 80 to work with the sane backend.
Tonight, I added in entries to the backend as described here:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2006-May/016972.html
sane-find-scanner detects the scanner.
Hi,
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 07:56:07PM +0200, Mark Pustjens wrote:
> i wanted to confirm that the canon lide 80 indeed has the GL841 chip
>
> output from sane-find-scanner -v -v:
>
> found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2214 [CanoScan],
> chip=GL841) at libusb:003:004
Thanks. I'
Hi,
i wanted to confirm that the canon lide 80 indeed has the GL841 chip
output from sane-find-scanner -v -v:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2214 [CanoScan],
chip=GL841) at libusb:003:004
output from lsusb:
Bus 003 Device 002: ID 04a9:2214 Canon Inc.
Device Descriptor:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 01:35:29PM -0500, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> I see from the support list that the Canon LiDE 80 is not
> currently supported. Is this something that's likely to
> change in the very near future, or is no one working on it?
It may change in future. I'm (still) working on
I see from the support list that the Canon LiDE 80 is not
currently supported. Is this something that's likely to
change in the very near future, or is no one working on it?
There didn't seem to be any discussion of this printer in
the archives of this list.
I like the LiDE series because of the s
36 matches
Mail list logo
