> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:29:01AM +0100, James Tappin wrote:
> Thanks for the reports. I've ordered one -- the colour base mentioned by
> one is actually not likely to be a major issue as most of my film
> photography is monochrome.
I do not think I've had any issues with color problems,
Thanks for the reports. I've ordered one -- the colour base mentioned by
one is actually not likely to be a major issue as most of my film
photography is monochrome.
On Jul 18, 2016, at 03:32 PM, James Tappin wrote:
>
> Hi everyone.
>I'm looking to upgrade my scanner from an Epson Perfection
Hi James,
I own a 9000f MkII and have had great success. I had a few hiccups getting it
going on Raspbian but on Ubuntu on an Intel x86 CPU and ArchLinuxARM it's
worked flawlessly, including with scanbd.
I've had very good results at 600dpi with 16bit colour scans using the
scanimage frontend
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 03:31:57PM +0100, James Tappin wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> I'm looking to upgrade my scanner from an Epson Perfection 1660, and
> based on: listed support on the sane website, specs and price; the best
> bet looks to be the Canon 9000f MkII.
>
> Does anybody her
Hi everyone.
I'm looking to upgrade my scanner from an Epson Perfection 1660, and
based on: listed support on the sane website, specs and price; the best bet
looks to be the Canon 9000f MkII.
Does anybody here have any real hands-on experience with that scanner, in
particular with film scanning
No problem! As they say, better late then never.
--
Roger
http://rogerx.freeshell.org/
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
Hello Roger,
Sorry for the late response.
I can still remember that the scanner doesn't accept gamma settings for
48 bits color scans. So you need to post process the images if they are
too dark. This is what you're doing within Gimp.
Cheers,
Rolf
Am 02.04.2016 um 06:39 schrieb Roger:
>> On Th
I think I've found a bug (when using a Canon 9000f MK2), scanning at 16 bits
color (AKA "Color") produces an apparent proper image gamma of 2.2, while
choosing to scan at "48 bits color" produces an image too dark, or an image
having an approximate gamma of less than or equal to one.
Both scani
Hi Al,
Am 23.08.2013 17:47, schrieb ?l ??gn?r:
> Am Fr, 23 Aug 2013 17:17:33 CEST schrieb ?l ??gn?r:
>
>> With a fresh install of Xubuntu 12.04 I use
>>
>> sane 1.0.14-9
>> sane-utils 1.0.22-7ubuntu1
>>
>> As user root:
>>
>> ~# /usr/bin/sane-find-scanner
>> found USB scanner (vendor=04a9 [Canon],
Am Fr, 23 Aug 2013 17:17:33 CEST schrieb ?l ??gn?r:
> With a fresh install of Xubuntu 12.04 I use
>
> sane 1.0.14-9
> sane-utils 1.0.22-7ubuntu1
>
> As user root:
>
> ~# /usr/bin/sane-find-scanner
> found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1908 [CanoScan])
> at libusb:008:002
>
> ~#
With a fresh install of Xubuntu 12.04 I use
sane 1.0.14-9
sane-utils 1.0.22-7ubuntu1
As user root:
~# /usr/bin/sane-find-scanner
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1908 [CanoScan]) at
libusb:008:002
~# /usr/bin/scanimage -L
No scanners were identified.
~# /usr/bin/scanimage
Hi,
I compile to /usr/local with the following path for the libs (according
to Fedora 17-Standards):
./configure --libdir=/usr/local/lib64
Then I set the librarypath for scanimage and xsane with ldconfig as
described in
http://blog.andrewbeacock.com/2007/10/how-to-add-shared-libraries-to-linuxs.
Hi Rolf,
Thanks for your quick response!
The links as described in README.linux were automatically set by the
build process. But Linux Mint13 expects the libs at
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
Cheers,
Heini
Herzlichen Dank!
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 16:44 +0200, Rolf Bensch wrote:
> Hi Heini,
>
> p
Hi Heini,
please read README.linux for details.
Your "new" scanimage uses the "old" distro's libsane.
I would prefer setting symbolic links, as described in README.linux.
If you want to replace the distro's libsane, then you should also use
the --bindir and --libdir parameters. --libdir must li
Hello,
I am using Linux Mint 13 and try to use a CanoScan 9000F up to now
without success.
My procedure:
Dowloaded sane backends 1.0.23, unpacked and in the source dir I did:
./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var
make
sudo make install
sane-find-scanner
# sane
Hi Kerstin,
I think this may be the issue. I'll try to cleanup everything I've
installed last night :) and then start clean. You know us noobs - we try
part of a solution from one blog, then the other from the second blog and
then post our problems to the third one. I'll write up what happens toda
Hi,
did you uninstall the older sane version of the distribution before?
This caused in my case problems.
Best wishes,
Kerstin
On Fri, 11 May 2012, Sergey Zolotaryov wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> Yesterday I started setting up my CanoScan 9000F. According to the docs
> sane supports this scan
Good afternoon,
Yesterday I started setting up my CanoScan 9000F. According to the docs
sane supports this scaner since last year. I compiled the sources for
sane-backend (with libusb) the sane-find-scaner output is the following:
anydoby at anydoby-System-Product-Name:~/sane/sane-backends/backen
Generally you do not want to uninstall the systems sane, as this will
uninstall all the front-end programs too. Instead, you want to compile
sane such that it will overwrite the original version. something like:
BACKENDS=pixma ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc
make
make install
you will
Did you try as root? Might be a permissions issue.
allan
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Sergey Zolotaryov wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> Yesterday I started setting up my CanoScan 9000F. According to the docs sane
> supports this scaner since last year. I compiled the sources for
> sane-backend
Am Di, 17 Apr 2012 18:38:46 CEST schrieb Rolf Bensch:
> Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb ?l ??gn?r:
> > Am Di, 17 Apr 2012 12:10:27 CEST schrieb Nicola:
> >
> >> are new to the Linux world, I installed Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, I'm
> >> very happy and everything works, except for the Canon 9000F I
> >> a
Am Di, 17 Apr 2012 13:10:46 CEST schrieb ?l ??gn?r:
> Am Di, 17 Apr 2012 12:10:27 CEST schrieb Nicola:
>
> > are new to the Linux world, I installed Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, I'm very
> > happy and everything works, except for the Canon 9000F I asked and
> > searched in other forums and they told me to
Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb ?l ??gn?r:
> Am Di, 17 Apr 2012 12:10:27 CEST schrieb Nicola:
>
>> are new to the Linux world, I installed Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, I'm very
>> happy and everything works, except for the Canon 9000F I asked and
>> searched in other forums and they told me to address here.
Am Di, 17 Apr 2012 12:10:27 CEST schrieb Nicola:
> are new to the Linux world, I installed Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, I'm very
> happy and everything works, except for the Canon 9000F I asked and
> searched in other forums and they told me to address here. can it
> work? I would like to avoid returning t
Le mar 17 avr, Nicola m'a ?crit:
> are new to the Linux world, I installed Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, I'm very
> happy and everything works, except for the Canon 9000F I asked and
> searched in other forums and they told me to address here. can it
> work? I would like to avoid returning to win just for th
are new to the Linux world, I installed Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, I'm very
happy and everything works, except for the Canon 9000F I asked and
searched in other forums and they told me to address here. can it
work? I would like to avoid returning to win just for the scanner.
thanks
Nicola
I changed it from an attachment to a link.
My contribution to driver development
a photo of the Canon Canoscan 9000F internals
http://www.stockholmviews.com/canon_9000f_review/canon-9000F-cleaning.html
Regards/ Stefan Lindgren
http://www.stockholmviews.com
-- next part --
27 matches
Mail list logo
