Hi,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 08:16:35AM +0100, Ulrich Deiters wrote:
> I just made a few minor changes (fixed an uninitialized variable, inserted
> checks for return status of some subroutines).
Ok. ChangeLog entry is missing :-)
Bye,
Henning
I just made a few minor changes (fixed an uninitialized variable, inserted
checks for return status of some subroutines).
Sincerely yours,
Ulrich Deiters
> Then, if gamma tables aren't supported (or at least aren't
> supported well), they shouldn't be offered to the frontend, right ?
Not necessarily: The backend emulates the contrast, brightness, ...
gamma options. This is even necessary for the FS2710, because it
requires a huge gamma correction o
I remember very well the troubles I had with my FS2710S when I tried to
upload gamma tables! The effects on the scans were very interesting from
the artist's point of view - a *very* modern artist, in fact. :-)
Now that I know the gamma table format the scanner recognizes I will try to
play again
Deiters wrote:
> thank you for the tip about the array length; I will check this.
I "hit" the bug some time ago (around 25/10), and Henning Meier-Geinitz
found it.
> The FS2710 does not seem to be influenced by downloaded gamma tables.
Yep! It is. Or at least I've had MAJOR troubles when trying t
Dear Diego,
thank you for the tip about the array length; I will check this.
The FS2710 does not seem to be influenced by downloaded gamma tables.
The original Canon (Windows) software feeds it 4 tables of 8192 byte
length (2^12 entries of 2 byte length), but does not change them
when you manuall
I just re-compiled the Canon-SCSI backend on HP-UX 10.20. It
seems to work. My congratulations to Mitsuru Okaniwa for
a successful bug hunt!
While playing with it I upgraded the support for Canon
film scanners: The focus controls (manual and autofocus)
for the FS2710S model are working now.
The r
