On 12 Apr 2002 13:26:23 +1200
mdew wrote:
> I thought it was something like this..
>
> http://www.gjaeger.de/scanner/plustek.html
>
> (sorry it was BearPaw..my typo)
No, BearPaw 1200 _CU_ is very different from the BearPaw 1200 without
extra letters. BearPaw 1200 TA is again different from 120
On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 04:10, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
I thought it was something like this..
http://www.gjaeger.de/scanner/plustek.html
(sorry it was BearPaw..my typo)
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 04:17:11PM +1200, mdew wrote:
> > Im looking at buying a Mustek (USB) "BearClaw 1200CU",
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 04:17:11PM +1200, mdew wrote:
> Im looking at buying a Mustek (USB) "BearClaw 1200CU", just need some
> opinions on this... How well is it supported? Scan Quality,
> problems. etc
By the way, it's called "BearPaw". Or is there yet another model?
Bye,
Henning
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 04:17:11PM +1200, mdew wrote:
> Im looking at buying a Mustek (USB) "BearClaw 1200CU", just need some
> opinions on this... How well is it supported? Scan Quality,
> problems. etc
It is not supported by the latest SANE version. However, there is a
stand-alone prog
Im looking at buying a Mustek (USB) "BearClaw 1200CU", just need some
opinions on this... How well is it supported? Scan Quality,
problems. etc
--
ph33r!
Linux mdew 2.4.18-xfs #1 Sun Mar 31 15:53:58 NZST 2002 i686 unknown
