Hi,
On 2006-03-18 19:03, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> And maybe while Giuseppe is grepping, he may also produce a
> patch to change all those options to "ADF" :)
Does the "average user" know what "ADF" means? If this shall really be
changed, it must also be changed in the SANE2 standard draft so w
Hi,
> > Not for the "for the sake" changes like strings of modes, but for
> > certain parts of the coding, yes - these days. When you look
> > carefully on our homepage you will also see that due to our
> > relationship from the Linux work, Avision contracted us to do
> > the OS X TWAIN driver.
>
Hi,
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 19:04, m. allan noah wrote:
> > Grepping backend directory revields matches for both.
>
> is 'Default' better than 'Normal'?
Ouhm.
> > The avision backend also handles film scanners where "Flatbed"
> > would be slightly misleading ...
> >
>
> can you change betwee
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Ren? Rebe wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 March 2006 15:32, m. allan noah wrote:
>
>> i do not feel strongly, but since you do- i will change fujitsu backend to
>> have only one 'source' opt, which will contain:
>>
>> "Flatbed|ADF Duplex|ADF Front|ADF Back"
>
> Great!
>
> Too bad there
>> fujitsu backend uses a separate option 'duplex' in addition to 'source'.
>> it can be "Front|Back|Both" and only applies when 'source' is "ADF"
>>
>> i think front/back is more correct american english, BTW.
>
> I would strongly vote to standarize on the source option, since it addition
> option
Hi,
On Sunday 19 March 2006 15:41, m. allan noah wrote:
> > Also the Avision backend aditionally features:
> >
> > "ADF Rear"
> > "ADF Duplex"
> >
> > in addition to:
> >
> > "ADF"
> >
> > So someone requested to rather rename it to "ADF Back", but though I'm
> > not a native English speaker I so
> Is there any way to know that ADF is installed and used? Should I strcmp
> all these strings?
At the moment, this is not standardized and "source" is also no
well-known option. The SANE2 draft says "Automatic Document Feeder".
So I guess at the moment you must gre
Hi all,
On Saturday 18 March 2006 19:34, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:54:08 +0100
> > Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> >
> >>> Is there any way to know that ADF is installed and used? Should I strcmp
> >>> all these strings?
> >>
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:54:08 +0100
> Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
>>> Is there any way to know that ADF is installed and used? Should I strcmp
>>> all these strings?
>>
>> At the moment, this is not standardized and "source" is also no
>> well-know
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:54:08 +0100
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> > Is there any way to know that ADF is installed and used? Should I strcmp
> > all these strings?
>
> At the moment, this is not standardized and "source" is also no
> well-known option. The SANE2 draft says "Automatic Document Fe
Henning Meier-Geinitz ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On 2006-03-14 14:22, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
>
>>I am facing a problem when I use many different scanners. I need to know
>>if the scanner source currently used in a scan is ADF or
>>flatbed.
>
>
> Why?
Because in this case I have to loop between all
Hi,
On 2006-03-14 14:22, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> I am facing a problem when I use many different scanners. I need to know
> if the scanner source currently used in a scan is ADF or
> flatbed.
Why?
> I noticed that different backends use different names like "FB",
> "Flatbed", "ADF", "Automatic
Hi all,
I am facing a problem when I use many different scanners. I need to know
if the scanner source currently used in a scan is ADF or
flatbed.
I noticed that different backends use different names like "FB",
"Flatbed", "ADF", "Automatic Document Feeder".
Is there any way to know that ADF is
13 matches
Mail list logo
