[sane-devel] LiDE 90 half ccd

2008-04-28 Thread Guillaume Gastebois
> Hello, > > OK, if i understand test values you proposed gives : > > 0xf f0 3f > bit of 0x79! 0x78 !0x77! 0x79 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7!0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7!0 1!0 1 2 3 4 5 6... > 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 > ___ >

[sane-devel] LiDE 90 half ccd

2008-04-28 Thread Guillaume Gastebois
Hello, OK, if i understand test values you proposed gives : 0xf f0 3f bit of 0x79! 0x78 !0x77! 0x79 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7!0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7!0 1!0 1 2 3 4 5 6... 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ___ |__|

[sane-devel] LiDE 90 half ccd

2008-04-26 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
Guillaume Gastebois schrieb: > Hello, > > No progress on 2400dpi. DPIHW is 2400 and dpiset 600 for a 300dpi scan. > Don't know where to look yet for that problem ! I'd try to get a log from a 2400dpi scan from windows and compare. > about byte nibbles modifying reg_0x79 from 0x3f to 0x3e (very f

[sane-devel] LiDE 90 half ccd

2008-04-26 Thread Guillaume Gastebois
Hello, No progress on 2400dpi. DPIHW is 2400 and dpiset 600 for a 300dpi scan. Don't know where to look yet for that problem ! about byte nibbles modifying reg_0x79 from 0x3f to 0x3e (very few contrasted image) or 0x40(black image) gives me bad images !!! What is effect of this register on clk3

[sane-devel] LiDE 90 half ccd

2008-04-22 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
Guillaume Gastebois schrieb: > Hello, > > I remember that LiDE 90 is a 2400DPI scanner. And I did nothing in code to > port > that. I backend ready for 2400dpi (I think so regarding portion of code) ? I am not sure, as there could not happen any testing. But in theory, it should work. In the fu

[sane-devel] LiDE 90 half ccd

2008-04-21 Thread Guillaume Gastebois
Hello, I remember that LiDE 90 is a 2400DPI scanner. And I did nothing in code to port that. I backend ready for 2400dpi (I think so regarding portion of code) ? I write 2400 dpi in genesys_sensor for lide 90. But how to know pixel number for CCD sensor ? After writing 2400 dpi in sensor, I get

[sane-devel] LiDE 90 half ccd

2008-04-20 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
Hi, Guillaume Gastebois schrieb: > Hello, > >> Guillaume Gastebois schrieb: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Me again ! >>> >>> I'm trying to find what are GPIO14,13,12 and 11 for. >>> >>> I find GPIO11=home switch and must be 0. >>> I thought I found GPIO14 was half CCD but by adding : >>> /* gpio part. here:

[sane-devel] LiDE 90 half ccd

2008-04-19 Thread Guillaume Gastebois
Hello, > Guillaume Gastebois schrieb: >> Hello, >> >> Me again ! >> >> I'm trying to find what are GPIO14,13,12 and 11 for. >> >> I find GPIO11=home switch and must be 0. >> I thought I found GPIO14 was half CCD but by adding : >> /* gpio part. here: for canon lide 90 */ >> if (dev->model->gpo_typ

[sane-devel] LiDE 90 Half CCD

2008-04-09 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
Guillaume Gastebois schrieb: > Hello, > > I see in genesys_gl841.c line 2503 : > > /* gpio part. here: for canon lide 35 */ > > r = sanei_genesys_get_address (reg, 0x6c); > if (half_ccd) > r->value &= ~0x80; > else > r->value |= 0x80; > > Does it mean that for LiDE 35 GP

[sane-devel] LiDE 90 Half CCD

2008-04-09 Thread Guillaume Gastebois
Hello, I see in genesys_gl841.c line 2503 : /* gpio part. here: for canon lide 35 */ r = sanei_genesys_get_address (reg, 0x6c); if (half_ccd) r->value &= ~0x80; else r->value |= 0x80; Does it mean that for LiDE 35 GPIO16 is half CCD IO ? Because in LiDE 90, I identif