[sane-devel] [PATCH v2 04/14] bldchn, checking for socklen_t more safe

2012-01-25 Thread Ruediger Meier
On Tuesday 24 January 2012, Chris Bagwell wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Ruediger Meier wrote: > > From: Ruediger Meier > > > > Here I just want to fix conflicts for win32 systems. Generally I'd > > say that we should never "#define socklen_t int" within config.h. > > But this may dec

[sane-devel] [PATCH v2 04/14] bldchn, checking for socklen_t more safe

2012-01-24 Thread Chris Bagwell
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Ruediger Meier wrote: > From: Ruediger Meier > > Here I just want to fix conflicts for win32 systems. Generally I'd say > that we should never "#define socklen_t int" within config.h. But this > may decide somebody else. > > Note this patch may break the build on

[sane-devel] [PATCH v2 04/14] bldchn, checking for socklen_t more safe

2012-01-24 Thread Ruediger Meier
From: Ruediger Meier Here I just want to fix conflicts for win32 systems. Generally I'd say that we should never "#define socklen_t int" within config.h. But this may decide somebody else. Note this patch may break the build on systems where socklen_t is available now but the right headers are n