Johannes,
Comments in your code suggest you have documentation on the LS-5000.
If so, does it say how to use the calibration data?
John
> Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 14:58:26 +0200
> From: Johannes Berg
> Subject: [sane-devel] [FYI] new ls5000 backend
> To: Major A
> Cc: Ariel
> If anybody wants to do it, all the better, but if it makes the code as
> unreadable and stupid as it was in coolscan2.c (like parsing bytes from
> a string at runtime...) then I will not take such a patch nor help
> maintain a forked version.
Please note that the author of coolscan2 is reading
ignature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20070512/c9047a2b/attachment.pgp
From johan...@sipsolutions.net Sat May 12 09:29:22 2007
From: johan...@sipsolutions.net (Johannes Berg)
Date: Sat May 12 10
Johannes Berg wrote:
Hi,
>> I've added ls5000 to sane-backends-extras 1.0.18.8.
>
> Oh, I'll probably have to submit a patch than that prevents coolscan2
> from binding the ls5000.
Yep, that'll be needed. Though LS-5000 owners won't use coolscan2 so
they can just disable it and be done with it.
Johannes Berg wrote:
Hi,
> I don't plan to submit any patches to coolscan2.c because that code is
> in my eyes horrible to work with. I also don't plan to submit ls5000.c
> to SANE because apparently SANE still requires that the backend builds
> with ancient compilers.
I've added ls5000 to sane
Hi Ren?,
> Indeed SANE is suppost to build on various other, aging Un*x flavours
> and this is why so far no backend does use C99 features (at least as
> far as I know and I also avoided it in my Avision backend as well).
Yeah, I know, that's why I said I don't plan to submit it. I have better
th
11 14:03:14 2007
From: r...@exactcode.de (=?iso-8859-1?q?Ren=E9_Rebe?=)
Date: Fri May 11 14:04:18 2007
Subject: [sane-devel] [FYI] new ls5000 backend
In-Reply-To: <117306.8896.22.ca...@johannes.berg>
References: <117306.8896.22.ca...@johannes.berg>
Message-ID: <2007051116
