On 06/07/07, Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
> Also, you need to use winsock2.h header (and, of course -lws2_32
> during link stage) because of Windows specific declarations (eg.
> WSAStartup(), the call without which any Winsock call would fail).
That is: ./configure LIBS="-lws2_32", right?
I cannot seem t
On 7/5/07, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> Another issue. MSG_WAITALL is not defined (according to my
> Msys/MinGW), but is defined according to the sources in sanei_tcp.c,
> as 0x08.
>
> I have had to define it separately, without reference to an ifdef
> structure. Could you please check this?
MSG_WAIT
On 05/07/07, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> How did you get around the dependence on Unix sockets? I looked
> through some of sources, but couldn't find any dependence on winsock
> either.
Hmmm. I included winsock2.h (renamed to socket.h).
Another issue. MSG_WAITALL is not defined (according to my
Msy
Hi Ilia,
On 03/07/07, Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
> Feel free to ask any questions regarding this SANE backends modification.
How did you get around the dependence on Unix sockets? I looked
through some of sources, but couldn't find any dependence on winsock
either.
Hugh
On 7/4/07, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> Even so, this is a valuable capability when mature. I'm imagining the
> departmental linux-connected scanner which returns image data to the Win32
> desktop. Scripting that with python via subprocess, there's a possibility
> to normalize and automate user scannin
Hi Ilia,
On 04/07/07, Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
> The whole picture isn't so bright - as for now, this native Win32
> version is limited only to dll, net backends and scanimage binary.
> During porting I've also tried libusb-win32 (this way device names
> would be similar, I think), but it looks little
Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
> The whole picture isn't so bright - as for now, this native Win32
> version is limited only to dll, net backends and scanimage binary.
Even so, this is a valuable capability when mature. I'm imagining the
departmental linux-connected scanner which returns image data to the W
On 7/4/07, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
...
> If you have any way to provide snapshot builds from time to time, these
> will probably have many more testers providing feedback.
>
> I don't have any Win32 machines on hand myself, but thanks very much for
> working on this.
>
> Out of curiosity, how are US
Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
> Last week I've committed native Win32 version of SANE. It's available
> for checkout at cvs.alioth.debian.org:/cvsroot/sane checkout
> experimental/sane-backends-win32. Any feedback will be greatly
> appreciated.
If you have any way to provide snapshot builds from time to ti
Hi Ilia,
On 03/07/07, Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
> Last week I've committed native Win32 version of SANE. It's available
> for checkout at cvs.alioth.debian.org:/cvsroot/sane checkout
> experimental/sane-backends-win32.
> Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
The code certainly looks good. Unfortu
On 7/3/07, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> The code certainly looks good. Unfortunately, there is no configure
> file included in the branch. I tried to work around this by using
> automake, but that also failed.
>
These files should be copied into existing sane-backends directory
(checked out from CVS,
Last week I've committed native Win32 version of SANE. It's available
for checkout at cvs.alioth.debian.org:/cvsroot/sane checkout
experimental/sane-backends-win32.
Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
--
Ilia Sotnikov
12 matches
Mail list logo
