Does scanimage actually contain the l10n
functionality?
-Yury
On 01/10/17 02:52, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
I set all those and I still get English.
export LANG=de_DE.utf8
...
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sa
On 12/04/17 18:05, Manuel Reiter wrote:
...
I want to convert a TIFF, scanned at 300 dpi, to a PDF of the same size and dpi. From my
searches, this should be achievable both with ImageMagick's "convert" with
output
Try tiff2pdf from LIBTIFF (don't know how to
look for the DPI in PDF, but the
Knowing the linux ways, you'll have to fiddle in
the network configuration part.
Basicly, the wifi configuration is doable in
three steps (all from command line):
ifconfig wlan0 up
iwconfig wlan0 essid 'name_of_your_wifi_network'
dhclient wlan0
In modern and oh-so-helpful distros, once you've
Hi, guys,
Anything doing with that Plustek's offer of
source code?
Would we see that in our (life)times? ))
-Yury
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe
On 01/11/16 21:11, Richard Ryniker wrote:
...
What happens when Plustek builds a new scanner? Who will want to go
through new Plustek code and do this again, when they have other things
to do?
A better alternative is to have Plustek adapt their code to SANE. Surely
...
Would be good to know
On 01/11/16 14:37, m. allan noah wrote:
Jenson- The SANE project certainly could accept your code for
inclusion into our repository, if a few conditions are met. Namely:
1. The code must be completely open and suitable for use with our
license. No binary or precompiled code, other than possible
Alternatively, you can use an external power
source for the USB hub. Strange for the scanner
to work at all with insufficient amperage, but...
On 15/06/16 11:53, Adrian wrote:
I had this with a different CIS scanner. In that case the problem was
that the USB socket (an unpowered hub) provided
Check your installation, specifically
/lib/udev/rules.d, which takes precedence over
/etc/udev/rules.d.
You might have something left over from previous
frontends installations, like I did, not so long
ago. Linux long installed tends to accumulate
cruft, like any other system.
On 08/05/16
Never used ethernet accessible scanners, but a
good practice on using sane from sources is to
be sure you don't have the previous versions'
'leftovers' (configs, `rules.d` files, ...) in
your installation.
I'd say your log hints at saned already being
run on your system with some already exi
Do your udev rules generate the device node with
correct permissions?
Did you check for udev rules leftovers from
older SANE versions, like in my case?
-Yury
On 10/20/2015 11:56 PM, Thomas Dahlén wrote:
...
I tested to create
/etc/udev/rules.d/40-scanner.rules
...
--
sane-devel mailing list
You could check also if my post to the list on
September 12 helps any.
Yury
On 10/20/2015 05:09 PM, Thomas Dahlén wrote:
...
I am already in the scanner group:
"I check /etc/group
lp:x:7:thomas
saned:x:120:
scanner:x:105:saned,thomas"
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debia
I might be talking completely off-point, but
scanning at 600dpi b/w takes 2+ minutes on canon
lide 25 (IIRC this is an older genesys chip).
Yury
On 10/08/2015 07:06 AM, Stef wrote:
On 07/10/2015 22:51, M G Berberich wrote:
I’m a bit puzzled. The old code (bd0f989 and
befor) did 600dpi-gray/l
On 09/29/2015 04:25 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
I just pushed all of these. I did re-write the microtek2 patch to use
the logic I pointed out in a prior mail.
/meaning sequenced `% 2` changed to sequenced '!'/
Isn't this fancy-coding now, though?
I didn't look in the backend and may have
comple
Had "one last look" at the problem, which did it. :)
The problem was two-part, and both parts were
related to the SANE sources/installation.
1) Wrong group ("lp") on scanner device node in
/dev/bus/usb/... was being set by udev
libsane.rules installed in /lib/udev/rules.d
(one of the 2013 d
On 09/12/2015 07:02 AM, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
Yury Tarasievich writes:
[snip]
The point is the software actually somehow fails
to open a lock file in /var/lock/sane, which
must involve some subtlety in my system. Like,
why does the device node get its group owner set
to 'lp'?
Well, the USB IDs are there in plustek.c :),
and, in fact, I've successfully used this same
box+scanner back in 2010 (such hardware lifespan
must be a thing unheard of in the West :) More,
I've did it as a normal user then, so I know
it's possible.
The point is the software actually somehow
ATM, I worry about that supposed recent
regression in plustek backend, mentioned here
week ago or so. Guys in the know, please tell,
is it really there?
Thanks
-Yury
On 09/11/2015 12:00 AM, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
If only I knew.
...
On 09/10/2015 11:12 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
what di
10, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Yury Tarasievich
wrote:
Not a well-known general problem, then? xsane/scanimage used to work okay on
this same distro, no problem at all, a few years ago.
...
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Not a well-known general problem, then?
xsane/scanimage used to work okay on this same
distro, no problem at all, a few years ago.
-Yury
On 09/10/2015 11:03 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
Will depend on your linux distro, some use hal instead of udev rules,
or some other thing. It is best to ask on
I'm having an issue of plustek backend
(sane-backends-git20150807) failing to open the
device under a non-root account. Can't use
scanimage, can't use xsane. Scanning under root
works fine.
The account is added to `scanner` group. Sane
udev rules in /etc/udev/rules.d mention
`scanner` grou
wrote:
Can you determine if the problem is still happening with a current
development version of sane-backends?
allan
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Yury Tarasievich
wrote:
I was checking a batch of grayscale scans made couple of years ago with
Canon LIDE 25, and I have a suspicion that on full
I was checking a batch of grayscale scans made
couple of years ago with Canon LIDE 25, and I
have a suspicion that on full A4-format scans
driver+sane (linux 32 bits, as compiled ca.2011)
could produce height-reduced (cropped) stripes
in image, spaced like something 20-25% of full
length.
I
Why not expand the xsane functionality in this
way, indeed?
-Yury
On 06/01/2015 08:09 AM, insaneme...@recursor.net
wrote:
...
in Windows, I can put in variously sized papers
into the scanner feed tray, and it'll
automatically output matching page sizes. I do
not have to do anything else.
I w
Would it translate in any sensible way to
plustek ST series, meaning elementary changes
like USB ids? Worth trying at all, would you say?
-Yury
On 12/16/2013 08:16 AM, Stef wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thanks for a hardware donation from Mathieu
> MD, I have been able to work on LiDE 80 suppor
The microcontroller is 89C52 (set in the panel,
1st photo), compatible with 8051 series.
Memory (2 chips) is to the left, and the flash
rom seems to be the chip with the largest number
of the pins, more to the left.
Seems like you'll have to acquire the usb dumps
corresponding to the various p
You are right, there are couple of registers in
Wolfson DACs, accessed via some sort of specific
serial interface. The frontend -- as the Genesys
GL* datasheets understand the word. Never mind.
My scanner is indeed ST28 with USB IDs 0x7B3
0x802. So yours would be, too.
Your hardware list fits
On 10/12/2012 07:57 AM, Stef wrote:
> these hardware information can help us to
> find how close to another scanner a specific
> model is. Since the ST24 is an unsupported GL646
> scanner, it is not as helpful as it could have
> been. Even when hardware is known, you'll have
> to know exactly
I'm willing to cross-test what you'll be
producing for the ST28, as I have one also, but
have currently no time to put into development.
On 10/11/2012 06:38 PM, Mohammad-Reza Nabipoor
wrote:
...
> And, according to my scanner board:
> * It is a GL841-based scanner
> * It uses ILX569K CCD. (same
Talking generally of unwritten backends, it's
quite a shame, that the development cycle isn't
"broken down" to some essential phases based on
what hardware is used in the scanner, and much
better documented. And yes, I've read
backend-writing.txt, and everything in the doc/
section, and sifte
On 03/26/2012 02:13 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
> Thanks for the alert, I'll look into it.
Snapshots work again, thank you.
Yury
No more daily git snapshots? Last one is stamped
Jan 16.
Yury
On 10/26/2011 01:10 AM, Yevgeny Gromov wrote:
> I try to write driver for Plustek optic pro s28 which is not supported yet in
> sane. Maybe someone tried to do it before me and have achieved some results?
>
> Just now after several hours of work I've only lerned how to turn off and on
> the lamp i
The early GL84* based Plusteks (ST28 etc.)?
And you need experts for implementing the
mechanical systems' control.
Me, I've tried to DIY the support for the ST28
but succeeded only in nearly busting the motor.
-Yury
On 08/25/2011 05:25 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
...
> I've personally never fou
Could you point to the message containing those
scripts? Or could you just repost the scripts,
please?
I believe those could be helpful with GL84*
plustek ST series, too.
-Yury
On 03/28/2011 10:27 PM, stef wrote:
...
> one way to try to make support progress would be to run the decoding
uot; movement
cycle working (I nearly busted the motor in my
Plustek ST28).
-Yury
On 03/03/2011 09:46 PM, stef wrote:
> Le Thursday 03 March 2011 16:24:34 Yury Tarasievich, vous avez ?crit :
>> Would that somehow affect the support of other
>> GL84* scanners?
...
> you are r
Would that somehow affect the support of other
GL84* scanners?
-Yury
On 03/02/2011 10:59 PM, stef wrote:
...
> The support for the G2410/HP2400 isn't complete yet. Adrian sent me good
> quality USB logs. But since I'm busy reworking gl847 part to reach 4800 dpi
> with my LiDE 200, I haven'
89C52 would seem to be the microcontroller
(http://www.embeddedj.co.th/downloads/sheets/ic/AT89C52.pdf)
The second part markings don't look like valid
marking pattern - to me, that is. I'm no real
expert on this.
-Yury
On 02/01/2011 12:54 AM, Besnik Bleta wrote:
...
t; allan
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Yury Tarasievich
> wrote:
>> I thought all the modern distros have got the group named 'scandev', which
>> is granted the access to the scanner devices? The slackware has got it (it
...
I thought all the modern distros have got the
group named 'scandev', which is granted the
access to the scanner devices? The slackware
has got it (it might be named a bit differently
on your distro).
You just add your username into the group , and
re-login.
-Yury
Could someone please give some advice on
scanners in genesys backend?
I own a Plustek OpticPro ST28, and so, for it to
work in SANE, I would have to program GL841
ASIC, L6219 motor controller, Sony ILX 569 CCD
and WM8196 digitizer (this latter I'm unsure of
and would have to re-check).
I'd l
Hi guys,
I own the OpticPro st28 and would like to have a SANE support for it.
I've already started copy-and-pasting the source, taking the
mechanicals from the existing GL841 models, and optical s from the
other OpticPro's present.
I also tried to approach the Plustek asking for the info on the
41 matches
Mail list logo
