Sorry to bug u again, I feel somehow stupid already... but I *really*
did not find it in any manuals. The question is:
How do I compile xsane with gimp support?
I did what I could imagine to get it working (all flags set, all the
libs, header files asf. installed correctly) but xsane keeps compla
Thanx a lot, Henning... you gave me the right idea. It's a local
resolver/DNS config problem... gonna look into that. Commented the "only
from" line in xinetd.conf and now it works.
Thank you, and wonderful christmas holidays to y'all! :-)
-wolfgang
Julien, Henning,
Thanks a bunch for the insight! Some questions remain, though... if I
may:
> If it does not start at all, that's usually an xinetd configuration
> problem. saned is only started when you connect to the port, not when
> xinetd is loaded.
That is exactly why i use xinetd for start
Hi all,
Maybe this is even somehow related to Jim George's problem... here's
what gives:
- Local scanning thru the parport as root works just fine
(mustek_pp backend). But ofc I want to use saned...
- Tried to start saned (as usual) from xinetd, which started without
errors... but saned did
e...@tiscali.be wrote:
> That's quite impossible, unless there is a serious bug in the driver.
> This type of scanner is pretty dumb and it doesn't move unless the driver
> tells it to move (and the driver never tells it to track back).
Hummm... so you mean, the stepping motor is directly control
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Maybe it's just backtracking? I.e. the scanner is too fast for the
> parallel port. Does the scan head stop shortly when the noise occurs?
> Or does it even move backe some milimeters?
Hmmm... hard to say, the steps are very small, ofc. It doesn't move
back. I'd say
Wolfgang Fabics wrote:
> I'll try... stepping back a few meters and closing my eyes ;-)
Thanks, Eddy! One problem solved: cis1200 gives me the correct scan
range :-)
> I'll give it a try with cis1200 and report back.
Bridge here, status report: Still positive on the clankin
e...@tiscali.be wrote:
> Are you sure that the MD9850 is a 600CP clone?
Well, I looked up the FCC# at http://www.fcc.gov and the exhibit there
(user manual) says it is a 600CP. sane-1.0.9 recognized it as 600IIIP,
sane-1.0.12 also says it is a 600CP...
> AFAIK, it is a 1200CP clone. The problem
Hi all,
Just upgraded to 1.0.12, now my MD9850 finally works locally & over the
net... nearly (congrats, guys!). Two issues remain:
- The frontends are done with scanning a page when the scanner itself is
only about halfway thru it (so I get a vertically strechted image of the
upper half of the o
