[sane-devel] Umax Astranet ia101

2005-04-27 Thread Union
--=_Part_1327_25537580.1114557387147 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline > This should not make any difference. The major difference is the > resolution you're working with! The preview does a scan at 75dpi and >

[sane-devel] Umax Astranet ia101

2005-04-15 Thread Union
--=_Part_2915_14119798.1113592326140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Well, strange thing now... I emerged stable version of sane-backend 1.0.15 (the same I have before),= =20 and so for everything is working

[sane-devel] Umax Astranet ia101

2005-04-15 Thread Union
With snapshot 15.04.2005 scanning works fine with 8 bit depth, with 14 bit depth is same as before (lump goes nowhere), but I suppose that scanner doesn't support it. Or am i wrong? In plustek.conf I changed altcalibration options to 1, because of purple color on left side, when doing preview. An

[sane-devel] Umax Astranet ia101

2005-04-14 Thread Union
I have managed to set up Astranet scanner in linux with 1.0.15 sane-backends and plustek driver. Its recognized as Umax 3400. But I have this problem http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2002-June/003504.html , which was mention 3 years back. Most of the time (while I want to scane,