On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> The backend is called "v4l".
OK, I was not at my Linux box and did not remember its name.
> > That is, only the first "scan"
> > produces a (more or less) correct image, while the others have the
> > succesive scanlines badly shifted. Is it no
Recently, the videodev2.h thread reminded me an old problem with the
video4linux (or is it v4l?) backend. That is, only the first "scan"
produces a (more or less) correct image, while the others have the
succesive scanlines badly shifted. Is it normal? Can it be avoided?
I know I can use other soft
Hi all,
Maybe somebody can give me a hint: I have a Microtek Phantom 636cx
(CIS-based) scanner which used to work wery well up to the day when the
AC/DC adapter went away. I bought a new generic 12V/1.2A DC adapter but
the scans now have slight rainbow stripes, depending on the resolution (or
the
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi, Oliver,
>
> XSane-0.85 does not run on my RH 7.2 LINUX box. It dies with
> segmentation fault after searching scsi scanner devices.
> (RedHat 7.2, Kernel 2.4.18).
>
> On the other hand, version 0.84 runs without any problem.
Same effect with Deb
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Karsten Festag wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Unfortunately it is too late for SANE-1.0.7, but Version
> 20020131 of the microtek2 backend is available on my
> homepage
> http://home.t-online.de/home/karsten.festag
> It should now support the X12USL via SCSI, the vertical
> stripes pro
On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Michael Thomson wrote:
> Hi Henning
>
> Thanks for your tips - I've successfully built & installed
> sane-backends-1.06 and sane-frontends-1.06 as well as xsane-0.80 now.
>
> Sadly I'm still getting weird stripes, but I found a previous discussion on
> this and I've mailed
