On Tue, 19 May 2009 09:11:58 -0400, m. allan noah wrote:
> PPA? sources.list.d? Plain English please?
Right, Personal Package Archive, a convention for Ubuntu (and Debian)
users to publish .deb packages on Launchpad. If an individual were
publishing the SANE test packages, a PPA might be a good ch
It would be very helpful if there were an official PPA for SANE .debs.
Ubuntu 9.04's use of libsane-1.0.19-23ubuntu7 would probably bring a
substantial influx of willing testers with hardware, if there was an easy
way to track 1.0.20 releases with an entry under sources.list.d.
Could the git snap
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> git clone ssh://login at git.debian.org/git/sane/sane-backends.git
>
> I guess I'm waiting for questions now?
Are the ssh:// urls for committers only?
Should users and packagers use the http:// url forms?
Thanks,
Jeff
m. allan noah wrote:
> we should use a service that alioth provides, and preferably one with
> broad multi-platform support.
I had some time while waiting for git clone cvs sane-backends ;) but I
was pleasantly surprised to find that Alioth supports +1-voted DVCSs:
http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/B
It appears that 'usermod -a -G scanner myuser' and logging back in isn't
sufficient for scanner access on this system:
$ SANE_DEBUG_EPJITSU=15 sudo scanimage -L 2>fi60.log
device `epjitsu:libusb:005:004' is a FUJITSU fi-60F 0A06 scanner
m. allan noah wrote:
> the firmware is loaded when you run scanimage, so a reboot
> should not be required.
>
> SANE_DEBUG_EPJITSU=15 scanimage -L 2>fi60.log
>
> and look thru that logfile.
Thanks.
What does 'could not open device: 11' signify?
$ SANE_DEBUG_EPJITSU=15 scanimage -L 2>fi60.log
$
I am having trouble accessing an epjitsu Fujitsu fi-60F at a remote site.
The scanner was plugged in yesterday, the host PC has not been rebooted,
and I would like to avoid doing that during business hours.
The host PC is Ubuntu 8.10 desktop, libsane-1.0.19-6ubuntu1:
$ scanimage -V
scanimage (san
Is there any interest in migrating SANE's CVS to a newer revision control
system?
Subversion would be an improvement for its repository-wide revision
numbers.
A DVCS such as git would be even more interesting, given the apparent
number of people who could contribute code and/or scanner test data.
On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:10:04 -0400, m. allan noah wrote:
> works perfectly with sane cvs, poorly with 1.0.19. debian's latest 1.0.19
> deb has a patch that gives basic support.
>
> sane cvs also enables every esoteric option i could find, including the
> endorser (if you get one).
Is there a sour
I noticed today that the Fujitsu fi-5120c was no longer listed at our
preferred online retailer. A new model fi-6130 was available with slightly
better specifications and a correspondingly higher price.
Is the Fujitsu fi-6130 a direct replacement for the fi-5120c?
Can anyone verify that the fi-61
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:20:04 +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
> Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:01:08 -0400, m. allan noah wrote:
>>
>>> well, i've just committed a patch to fix this, but please test, as i
>>> never saw the error message in the fi
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:01:08 -0400, m. allan noah wrote:
> well, i've just committed a patch to fix this, but please test, as i
> never saw the error message in the first place...
Does anyone have a good procedure for patching and rebuilding
released ubuntu .debs to test upstream changes? Or a wa
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:10:51 +0200, Jochen Eisinger wrote:
> export MALLOC_CHECK_=0
> If possible, use valgrind -v scanimage -d epjitsu to generate the
> backtrace, it will be more informative.
gdb terminal spew hit a magic ansi sequence that made the text unreadable.
If you can suggest a command
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:51:50 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> $ scanimage -d epjitsu
>> (massive ansi terminal spew)
>> *** glibc detected *** scanimage: double free or corruption (!prev):
>> 0x08053ca0 ***
>>
My Fujitusu Fi-60f produces a color scan on Ubuntu Hardy 8.04 Desktop,
but emits a double-free error at the end.
My purpose of this post is to gather information for a proper bug report
to the attention of Ubuntu.
If anyone knows how to correct this directly (rebuild package, etc.), I'd
be very i
Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
> The whole picture isn't so bright - as for now, this native Win32
> version is limited only to dll, net backends and scanimage binary.
Even so, this is a valuable capability when mature. I'm imagining the
departmental linux-connected scanner which returns image data to the W
Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
> Last week I've committed native Win32 version of SANE. It's available
> for checkout at cvs.alioth.debian.org:/cvsroot/sane checkout
> experimental/sane-backends-win32. Any feedback will be greatly
> appreciated.
If you have any way to provide snapshot builds from time to ti
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:32:24 +0200, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> which kernel did you use? I've currently checked that on a SuSE10,
> kernel 2.6.13 and turned on CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND - no problems so far.
>
> I tried to put the LiDE20 into suspend - no problems. Next thing
> I need to check is my laptop,
Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> My everyday flatbed scanner ((vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x220d
> [CanoScan], chip=LM9832/3) at libusb:002:002) got out of sorts today.
> The scan head wasn't returned to the home position (it is now), but
> XSane scans now just return solid black data.
I'm starting to look more closely at scanner troubleshooting issues for
deployment. Is there a utility or command parameter that will instruct a
scanner to park the head back in the home position and generally reset
itself to a safe/ready state?
My everyday flatbed scanner ((vendor=0x04a9 [Canon],
m. allan noah wrote:
> the kodak i30 and i40 are rebadged avision av200's, and i think
> visioneer sells one too. i had a kodak i40 here for awhile, it works ok
> with sane, but there were some 'pausing' or timeout issues when you
> first start scanning, even with the latest version of rene's avisi
Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> I need to scan visitors' plastic/laminate identification cards. The scans
> are to be initiated via web app, signalling a headless SANE linux server
> to scan via scanadf, network scanning, python PIL/sane, etc.
>
> Has anyone got any vendor and model r
I need to scan visitors' plastic/laminate identification cards. The scans
are to be initiated via web app, signalling a headless SANE linux server
to scan via scanadf, network scanning, python PIL/sane, etc.
Has anyone got any vendor and model recommendations for a specialised USB
card scanner (SA
I'm looking for current recommendations for a fast ADF scanner with
reliable paper handling and stable SANE driver support for the desired
modes accessed via python PIL/Sane, scanadf, scanner access across
network, etc.
In the past (I ask every year or so, haven't bought yet) m. allan noah and
oth
I neglected to add my libusb-0.1.12 information to the previous long
configuration description, which apparently directly affects the udev
device node mapping, permissions, etc.
I also found this forum comment:
"What *should* happen is that the udev rules in
/etc/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules get
Please forgive the very long post, but I wanted to get some specifics
recommended actions to restore access to my Canon LIDE20 scanner, which
has been inaccessible roughly since the upgrade to sane-backends-1.0.17.
My scanner problems seemed to closely match reports those of users with
permissions
Horst Herb wrote:
>> interface: USB-2.0
>> ADF: 50 sheet or larger,
>> config: upright, flatbed not desired
>> speed: >= 15 ?ppm @ 300 dpi 1-bit,
>> ? ? ? ? ? 10 ?ppm @ 300 dpi 256-grayscale,
>> ? ? ? ? ? 25+ ppm @ 150 dpi 1-bit
>> intangibles: sane support, good reliability reputation
>> (esp ADF
Of course I meant fi-4120C2.
And does anyone have any (sane) experience with the newer fi-5120C? Thanks.
http://www.fcpa.fujitsu.com/products/scanners/fi-5120C/specifications.html
I've still not purchased a fast ADF scanner for home-office use. I was
hoping someone might have tried a recent model of a certain class that was
working well for them under sane.
interface: USB-2.0
ADF: 50 sheet or larger,
config: upright, flatbed not desired
speed: >= 15 ppm @ 300 dpi 1-bit,
Has anyone had occasion to use the following Fujitsu scanner with the current
SANE fujitsu back-end?
Fujitsu Fi-5110EOX2 600 x 600dpi USB Interface Sheet Fed/Document Fed Scanner
I'd been planning on a Fujitsu Fi-4120C2, which costs more than twice as much.
I presume that despite similar external
m. allan noah wrote:
> the scanner speed on the 4120C was limited by the speed of the bus. to
> be honest, i only go up to 200dpi, so i have not tested the speed of the
> 4120C2 at higher resolutions.
I just checked with Fujitsu's online support (should have done that
first), and they stated that
Before I settle on the Fujitsu fi-4120C2, would the author of the AV220
support (René Rebe) care to weigh in on how well the Kodak i60 and i80
have been working with his avision SANE driver? (Or anyone that has used
the i60 or i80 with SANE, for that matter)
- 1bit and grayscale
- 300dpi
- USB 2.0
m. allan noah wrote:
> i only know fujitsu models, so i am sure there are others, but the
> fi-4120C2 is pretty fast, and the sane support is ok for binary and
> grayscale.
Thanks for the reply. The fujitsu models were my leading candidates.
Thanks for your work on the SANE support for these.
The
I'm looking for an ADF-capable scanner to do fast scanning. Has anyone got
recommendations for models that meet most of the following criteria?
- 1-bit and greyscale modes are the only ones that matter here
- 300 dpi, and able to do 300dpi at high speed
- ADF (or ADF option) that has good pap
Has your organization had any experience with the 4530C? This small monster has
great specs (35-47ppm, 100-sheet large-format ADF, USB 2.0), although its sure
to cost well over two kilobucks even if you found a discount reseller. If the
quality is an extrapolation of what you've found in the 4120C,
"m. allan noah" wrote:
> the 4120/4220 on the other hand, are absolutely wonderful, heavy, small,
> welbuilt machines, with excellent paper feeds, even for heavy stock. we
> now have quite a few of them in the field, each scanning a few hundred
> sheets per day, and are quite happy with the perf
After a long while of doing without, I may suddenly need a good scanner for a
collection of documents. I would like to find something with the following
characteristics, if anyone has tried a model that fits the bill.
a) Linux and SANE compatibility exists today. Limited feature support OK.
b) AD
37 matches
Mail list logo
