Bonjour,
> quel logiciel ou paquet dois-je rentrer dans mon ordinateur pour
> utiliser le scanner "hp scanjet 2300c. Merci de r?pondre en fran?ais si
> possible.
Ceci est une liste de d?veloppeurs, pas une liste de support, votre question
n'est pas appropri?e ici.
De plus vous ne donnez aucune
Hi,
I'm sending the call for participation to the Alt-OS devroom since I
believe SANE is ported to several alternative FOSS OSes and it might be
interesting to hear about porting experiences, integration with GUIs,
and porting requirements for new platforms. So if anyone wants to talk
about SAN
> On 11/11/2009 11:22 PM, stef wrote:
> > Running your scanner from a vmware windows guest OS will work.
> >
>
> Use VirtualBox instead.
QEMU should also be able to forward USB devices to the guest, on linux
hosts at least, but I never really tried hard.
As per http://www.qemu.org/qemu-
> 2008/12/28 David Poole :
> >> Sounds like you would be the kind of manufacturer to publish
> > > protocol
> >> specs, do you plan to do that, or have you done so?
> >
> > Me, personally, I'd love to be able to do that. I've talked with
> > my
> > managers and no go. As a previous poster menti
> > Sounds like you would be the kind of manufacturer to publish
> > protocol
> > specs, do you plan to do that, or have you done so?
>
> Me, personally, I'd love to be able to do that. I've talked with my
> managers and no go. As a previous poster mentioned, our business
> types consider our
> "Fran?ois Revol" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> There actually was a scanner/imaging device standard class defined
> >> for
> >> USB, and it never went anywhere.
> >
> > Well, just like webcams, until finally some big player switched to
> > UVC,
> > like Apple.
>
> My point. Except the iSight doesn
> Hi,
>
> > The way to do this would be to define some USB protocol and have it
> > standardised by the USB Implementers Forum, then use that to
> > influence
> > the OEM scanner manufacturers to implement it on new scanners.
>
> There actually was a scanner/imaging device standard class defined
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have started to change sane-frontends to handle new status
> > code
> > from SANE
> > 1.1 . But before any commit, I suppose one should tag current
> > sources.
> >
>
> new status code ?
> Hmm where should I snoop to know what to change ?
> I might have to update
> Hello,
>
> I have started to change sane-frontends to handle new status code
> from SANE
> 1.1 . But before any commit, I suppose one should tag current
> sources.
>
new status code ?
Hmm where should I snoop to know what to change ?
I might have to update Sanity later...
Or may
> Also note that we have active OS/2, OS X and Win32 ports, that are
> pretty much guaranteed to break if we start going Linux-only, too.
And BeOS, but Philippe seemed to be quite busy :)
Hopefully Haiku soon as well.
Fran?ois.
> > proprietary unices can't use gcc or another C99 compiler?
> > Which unix in particular?
>
> Pretty much all of them ship compilers that do not implement C99 or
> do
> not implement all of it yet. Moreover, we're speaking of systems that
> often do not get updated for a variety of reasons, s
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > "m. allan noah" wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > > Now that distros have gotten udev under control, and users are
> > > learning to modify it, we have seen cases where a person made
> > > their
> > > scanner show up as /dev/scanner. Th
> >
> >
> > :) libusb is probably used in 90% of the user base..
> > shouldn't be a problem,
> > unless someone is really using a 2.4 kernel with /dev/scanner
>
> typical linux developer response :) sane builds on alot of other
> systems- e.g. the OSX libusb names are really long GUID-looking
> On 5/6/08, ?tienne Bersac wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks alan fo this post. I agree with everything on you list.
> > Just add
> > something : would it be possible to just "ensure" that all usb
> > scanner
> > backends support libusb:xxx:yyy as "fallback" device name ?
>
> i think we can do
> Message-ID: <87sla68iw4@sonic.technologeek.org>
>
> > Haven't tried this myself so YMMV.
>
> That would be an excellent solution, provided it works with our
> modified version of libtool (for those unaware of it, sane-backends
> uses a slightly modified libtool version, so be careful if you
> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 03:37:13 +0100
> From: "Rene W. Olsen"
>
If SIGPIPE doesn't exist there is no reason to touch its handler :)
How about...
static void
restore_sigpipe( void )
{
#ifdef SIGPIPE
struct sigaction act;
if( sigaction( SIGPIPE, NULL, &act ) == 0 ) {
if( act.
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 03:58:09PM +0200, Frangois Revol wrote:
> > - we don't have a libusb port, and I had a sm3600 around,
> > so I ported the backend over to sanei
> > (was it some kind of foreign code not fully ported ??),
>
> The sm3600 backend has been changed to use sanei_usb now instea
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
Zoidberg-BeMail-temp
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I'm sending the diffs against sane-backends-1.0.15 for the sane port we
use in ZETA, which is ba
18 matches
Mail list logo
