Re: [sane-devel] Canon 9000f MKII -- or other comparable scanner?

2016-07-19 Thread Roger
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:29:01AM +0100, James Tappin wrote: > Thanks for the reports. I've ordered one -- the colour base mentioned by > one is actually not likely to be a major issue as most of my film > photography is monochrome. I do not think I've had any issues with color problems,

Re: [sane-devel] [janitorial] musl builder, PDF SANE Standard, __sane_unused__

2016-07-19 Thread Louis Lagendijk
> > > > At openSUSE we use libusb-1 since openSUSE 12.2 > > (i.e. we use libusb-1 since about April 2012) > > via "configure --enable-libusb_1_0". > > I am not aware of issues because of this. > >

Re: [sane-devel] [janitorial] musl builder, PDF SANE Standard, __sane_unused__

2016-07-19 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Hi Johannes, Johannes Meixner writes: > Hello, > > On Jul 18 22:18 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (excerpt): >> I had expected at least some reaction to my announcement[1] >> of the switch to libusb-1.0 as the new default for USB but, >> failing any, I assume that everyone is happy and all is well. >> >>

Re: [sane-devel] Canon 9000f MKII -- or other comparable scanner?

2016-07-19 Thread James Tappin
Thanks for the reports. I've ordered one -- the colour base mentioned by one is actually not likely to be a major issue as most of my film photography is monochrome. On Jul 18, 2016, at 03:32 PM, James Tappin wrote: > > Hi everyone. >I'm looking to upgrade my scanner from an Epson Perfection

Re: [sane-devel] [janitorial] musl builder, PDF SANE Standard, __sane_unused__

2016-07-19 Thread Johannes Meixner
Hello, On Jul 18 22:18 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (excerpt): I had expected at least some reaction to my announcement[1] of the switch to libusb-1.0 as the new default for USB but, failing any, I assume that everyone is happy and all is well. [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/