On 09/03/2015 13:20, Pierre-Alain Tercier wrote:
Dears,
(sane-backends git version from yesterday)
I'm able to scan (and preview) at 300dpi a full page
But not at 600dpi and not if I restrict the area to a smaller part!
I will try to follow the situation.
At the mmoment on my debian-jessie I h
On 09/03/15 12:20, Pierre-Alain Tercier wrote:
Dears,
(sane-backends git version from yesterday)
I'm able to scan (and preview) at 300dpi a full page
But not at 600dpi and not if I restrict the area to a smaller part!
I will try to follow the situation.
At the mmoment on my debian-jessie I had
On 09/03/2015 18:11, hugo roglan wrote:
I found a post that explains how to avoid calibration process in a scanner
CanoScan LIDE 20.
The scanner I have is the CanoScan LiDE 210.
The driver used is genesys_gl124.c.
Is it possible to make the same changes in my scanner?
Thanks/.
/
http://lists.a
Greetings. I hope someone can help me with this problem. Basically
sane-find-scanner always detects the scanner but scanimage -L almost
always responds with No devices found, and running these as regular user
or as root yields the same result.
I have sane-backends vesion 1.0.24-2.1.10 on openS
I found a post that explains how to avoid calibration process in a
scanner CanoScan LIDE 20.
The scanner I have is the CanoScan LiDE 210.
The driver used is genesys_gl124.c.
Is it possible to make the same changes in my scanner?
Thanks
*.*
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2008
Dears,
(sane-backends git version from yesterday)
I'm able to scan (and preview) at 300dpi a full page
But not at 600dpi and not if I restrict the area to a smaller part!
I will try to follow the situation.
At the mmoment on my debian-jessie I had to manually moves all the
libsane stuff from