On 21/11/2013 20:31, Paul Newall wrote:
> On 21/11/13 14:29, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>> Hi Stef,
>>
>> On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 07:12 +0100, Stef wrote:
>>> you also have to change the expected results in the testsuite to
>>> take into account this change. 'make check' will now fail. I have
>>> u
On 21/11/13 14:29, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Hi Stef,
>
> On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 07:12 +0100, Stef wrote:
>> you also have to change the expected results in the testsuite to
>> take into account this change. 'make check' will now fail. I have
>> updated the testsuite to handle git version numbe
Hi Stef,
On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 07:12 +0100, Stef wrote:
> you also have to change the expected results in the testsuite to
> take into account this change. 'make check' will now fail. I have
> updated the testsuite to handle git version number change so you can
> update it easily.
ahh sor
On 20/11/2013 21:59, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
>
> nilsph-guest pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository sane-backends.
>
> commit 758731489d0d58bab6e4b70db9556038c9f4bb67
> Author: Nils Philippsen
> Date: Wed Nov 20 21:45
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/05/2013 09:29 PM, ABC wrote:
>> SCX-3400 model is already in the upstream. But it is marked
>> as "untested". If it's actually tested please report. And, AFAIK
>> libsane.rules is don't need to be edited because it is
>> autogenerated (somebo
shall greatly appreciate any help.
Thanks in advance.
Mainak
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20131121/ed979678/attachment.html>
