.24 gives
> no output.
>
>
>
> Any idea what to try next?
>
> Pjotr.
>
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20130902/5602fd18/attachment.html>
Hello,
I need a scanner which can scan film (35 and 120) and has a free driver.
I need it because I'd like to scan on x86, powerpc and arm
architectures, I need to not depend on operating system version, I need
driver continue to work with latest glibc.
As far as I understand, the canoscan 900
Alessandro Zummo writes:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:42:13 +0900
> Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been chasing a bug where the epson2 backend prevented another
>> backend from recognizing that backend's supported network scanners.
>> Turns out that the epson2 backend holds on to fi
m. allan noah writes:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Olaf Meeuwissen
> wrote:
>> Olaf Meeuwissen writes:
>>
>>
>> So my question really boils down to whether backends must/should close
>> any file descriptors opened as a result of calling sane_get_devices().
>>
>> Thoughts, anyone?
>
> My ba
Alessandro Zummo writes:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:53:56 +0900
> Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
>> In my particular scenario not closing the file descriptor would prevent
>> an alternative backend from recognizing the device as supported if its
>> sane_get_devices() is run after the epson2 one. If the
