;
> > --
> > sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
> > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
> > to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
>
>
>
> --
> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20130826/5e9333ff/attachment.html>
Hi, I am currently experiencing the same problem.
I would be glad to help in troubleshooting it.
Canoscan N650U on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (x64)
Best regards,
Andrea
Il giorno lun, 26/08/2013 alle 17.13 +0200, Winni ha scritto:
> Hi,
> again, I tried 20 minutes to scan with the Canonscan N 650U. In
>
Hi,
again, I tried 20 minutes to scan with the Canonscan N 650U. In
comparison to the last time, all attempts resulted this time in this
awful noise.
I booted WinXP 32-bit (twain drivers) and within 2 minutes two pages
were scanned perfectly.
How can I help you guys with this? Is there anything
m. allan noah writes:
> That is one option. The other is to do own own upcasing, [...]
Sure, but why bother if you can use standard library API?
--
Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2 FLOSS Engineer -- AVASYS CORPORATION
FSF Associate Member #1962 Help support software freedom
rting-backend-names-to-env-.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1157 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20130826/2543ff6a/attachment.patch>
Chris Bagwell writes:
> Applied this patch and your other model patch to git.
Thanks!
> Someone else will have to do the HTML part.
That'll probably be allan (or a cron job).
--
Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2 FLOSS Engineer -- AVASYS CORPORATION
FSF Associate Member #1962 Hel
> Sure, but why bother if you can use standard library API?
agreed.
allan
--
"The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Olaf Meeuwissen
wrote:
> m. allan noah writes:
>
>> That is one option. The other is to do own own upcasing, [...]
>
> Sure, but why bother if
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 08:12:23PM -0700, Dale Amon wrote:
> scanner does look nice. Only down side is that I was hoping for 12x17
> to cover the size of some common (for me) items.
Ah, not a problem. Someone on eBay rounded down. It is 11.7x17 which
is just right.
Thanks for the pointer.
