On 20 May 2013 14:19, m. allan noah wrote:
>> but in certain situations, for instance remote access, it is not
>> possible to use the SANE API directly. Also, debugging a backend
>> problem is much easier with scanimage.
>
> I am curious about both of these assertions- can you elaborate the
> adva
Thank, Stef.
Stef [2013-05-16 21:19 +0200]:
>Hello,
>
>I have improved the rts8891 backend to better support some
>sensors post 1.0.23 release, which were only partially supported. You
>should try to compile latest source code to benefit from it.
I compiled the latest sources from gi
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Jeffrey Ratcliffe
wrote:
> GUIs often either use the SANE API directly, or control a scanner by
> wrapping scanimage.
>
> Generally, there is no advantage in using scanimage, as it is slower,
> but in certain situations, for instance remote access, it is not
> poss
