Am Di, 17 Apr 2012 18:38:46 CEST schrieb Rolf Bensch:
> Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb ?l ??gn?r:
> > Am Di, 17 Apr 2012 12:10:27 CEST schrieb Nicola:
> >
> >> are new to the Linux world, I installed Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, I'm
> >> very happy and everything works, except for the Canon 9000F I
> >> a
Am Di, 17 Apr 2012 13:10:46 CEST schrieb ?l ??gn?r:
> Am Di, 17 Apr 2012 12:10:27 CEST schrieb Nicola:
>
> > are new to the Linux world, I installed Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, I'm very
> > happy and everything works, except for the Canon 9000F I asked and
> > searched in other forums and they told me to
Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb ?l ??gn?r:
> Am Di, 17 Apr 2012 12:10:27 CEST schrieb Nicola:
>
>> are new to the Linux world, I installed Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, I'm very
>> happy and everything works, except for the Canon 9000F I asked and
>> searched in other forums and they told me to address here.
Thanks, Olaf, for your very detailed & obviously competent remarks!
I hope you & Michael Nagel & other experts will produce something
positive out of all this, which, as a dumb user, is way over my head, of
course.
On 17/04/12 01:48, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Care to explain about those negatives
Am Di, 17 Apr 2012 12:10:27 CEST schrieb Nicola:
> are new to the Linux world, I installed Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, I'm very
> happy and everything works, except for the Canon 9000F I asked and
> searched in other forums and they told me to address here. can it
> work? I would like to avoid returning t
Le mar 17 avr, Nicola m'a ?crit:
> are new to the Linux world, I installed Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, I'm very
> happy and everything works, except for the Canon 9000F I asked and
> searched in other forums and they told me to address here. can it
> work? I would like to avoid returning to win just for th
are new to the Linux world, I installed Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, I'm very
happy and everything works, except for the Canon 9000F I asked and
searched in other forums and they told me to address here. can it
work? I would like to avoid returning to win just for the scanner.
thanks
Nicola
Am 16.04.2012 22:48, schrieb DemoFreak:
> Am Montag, 16. April 2012, 22:15:40 schrieben Sie:
>> Am 16.04.2012 20:24, schrieb DemoFreak:
>>> So it seems that 75dpi is the default, so why it always scanned with
>>> 600dpi when I used the wrong parameter order?
>> I will fix this tomorrow. Many thanks
Am 16.04.2012 22:18, schrieb m. allan noah:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Rolf Bensch wrote:
>> Am 16.04.2012 20:24, schrieb DemoFreak:
>>
>>> Am Montag, 16. April 2012, 15:28:11 schrieben Sie:
Please try this: "scanimage -d pixma:04A91908 --source Flatbed
--resolution 300 --mo
Third attempt, trying to work my way around alioth's ridiculous
anti-spam measures...
My trusty Epson GT-7000 died today. Annoying, but not the end of the
world, given that I also have an Epson Stylus Office BX300F all-in-one.
However, I can't get it working with sane:
riva:~# scanimage
Michael Nagel writes:
> Here a copy of my message that I also posted to
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/simple-scan/+bug/891586
>
>
>
> The 3 minute freeze:
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2012-February/029481.html
>
> The thing is that SANE p
2cv67 <2cv67 at free.fr> writes:
> Hi! I am new here & out of my depth, so please excuse dumbness...
>
> I am using an Epson Perfection V200 scanner in Lubuntu 11.10 & also in
> Ubuntu 10.04.
>
> Using Epson's Avasys iScan (2.28.1-3ltdl7 etc) then I get offered a
> huge range of dpi's, all of whic
"emmanuel.michel at wanadoo.fr" writes:
> [...]
>> So - my questions are:
>> 1. Is that weird set of X & Y dpi's what I should be seeing for this
>> scanner?
>> 2. Can I do anything to get other values - preferably with same X & Y,
>> particularly 75/100/150 ?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> 2CV67
>
> H
13 matches
Mail list logo
