[sane-devel] Reflecta ProScan 7200

2011-03-08 Thread Jan Vleeshouwers
m. allan noah gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Michael Rickmann gwdg.de> > wrote: > > I got a Reflecta USB film scanner to digitize my collection of old slides > > and negatives. > > > > Some random thoughts: > > 1. SCSI over USB is a fairly common way for makers to up

[sane-devel] CanoScan Lide 110 on Ubuntu 10.10

2011-03-08 Thread Tammo Heeren
I am really hopping that somebody can help me. I am at a loss. I have a CanoScan Lide 110 on Ubuntu 10.10. sane-find-scanner returns "found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1909 [CanoScan], chip=GL124) at libusb:002:005" (which it should) however, scanimage -L just returns the usual "N

[sane-devel] question about code style

2011-03-08 Thread Warren Turkal
at lists.alioth.debian.org > > > > > > -- > "The truth is an offense, but not a sin" > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20110308/a1ab837e/attachment.htm>

[sane-devel] xerox_mfp usb malfunction

2011-03-08 Thread Warren Turkal
.. URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20110308/a6acc4a2/attachment.htm>

[sane-devel] xerox_mfp usb malfunction

2011-03-08 Thread ABC
I will correct the bug. Device string is parsed for network scanner support. On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 08:23:43AM -0500, m. allan noah wrote: > I am familiar with sanei_usb device detection, and I speak diff. The > only thing that seems odd is just why the backend is parsing the > device strings.

[sane-devel] xerox_mfp usb malfunction

2011-03-08 Thread m. allan noah
I am familiar with sanei_usb device detection, and I speak diff. The only thing that seems odd is just why the backend is parsing the device strings. The author was responding to bug reports yesterday, so I think it's a bit early for you to be pessimistic :) allan -- "The truth is an offense, bu

[sane-devel] xerox_mfp usb malfunction

2011-03-08 Thread Warren Turkal
Responses below. On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:13 AM, m. allan noah wrote: > Thanks for the patch. I must confess I don't quite understand the > code. A lot of the lines of code just added debugging output so that I could see what functions were being called as I find the code pretty difficult to fol

[sane-devel] question about code style

2011-03-08 Thread m. allan noah
You may produce whatever patches you want. It is up to the backend author to accept the patch. allan On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:54 AM, Warren Turkal wrote: > I see no consistent use of spaces and tabs in the source files that I > am looking at. It makes it very difficult to see the flow of the cod

[sane-devel] question about code style

2011-03-08 Thread Warren Turkal
I see no consistent use of spaces and tabs in the source files that I am looking at. It makes it very difficult to see the flow of the code. Would a re-indent patch be accepted for some of these files so that they might be easier to read be acceptable? Thanks, wt