[sane-devel] Canoscan LiDE 700F

2010-11-08 Thread stef
Le Monday 08 November 2010 21:03:02 Gweltas, vous avez ?crit : > I tried to connect my Canoscan scanner on a Kubuntu Maverick 64 bits. > I followed this procedure step by step > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1238578#6 : > > 1. I copied the latest git > 2. the make was ok > 3. I added th

[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or > scanimage

2010-11-08 Thread stef
Le Monday 08 November 2010 12:54:11 Myroslav Kavatsyuk, vous avez ?crit : > Dear colleagues, > > Thank you for your replies. I find that addition of the --all-options > is a nice idea to improve the user interface. Unfortunately it > does not solve my problem. This weekend I tried to debug sane >

[sane-devel] Canoscan LiDE 700F

2010-11-08 Thread Gweltas
> [genesys] sanei_genesys_read_gl847_register(0x6c)=0xe3 > [genesys] sanei_genesys_write_gl847_register (0x6c, 0xfb) completed > [genesys] sanei_genesys_read_gl847_register(0x41)=0xfc > [genesys_gl847] status=PWRBIT BUFEMPTY FEEDFSH SCANFSH HOMESNR LAMPSTS > *[genesys] sanei_genesys_read_gl847_register (0x41): failed while > setting register: Invalid argument* > [genesys_gl847] gl847_slow_back_home: failed to read home sensor: > Invalid argument > scanimage: open of device genesys:libusb:002:008 failed: Invalid argument > [genesys] sane_exit: start > [genesys] sane_exit: exit So it seems that I've got an issue with the register (0x41 ?). BTW I cannot find the 0x41 registry in the genesys files. So how can I go on ? Do you have any idea ? Do you know where I could find any technical documentation that I could use to understand what is going wrong ? Perhaps would I need to create a specific CIS_CANONLIDE700 but I really don't know how to handle it... Thank you for your answers ! -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20101108/676ed6b7/attachment-0001.htm>

[sane-devel] [PATCH] v4l: convert to RGB

2010-11-08 Thread Julien BLACHE
Marc Deslauriers wrote: > This patch will convert the data returned by v4l1 to RGB so it is > displayed properly by sane frontends expecting SANE_FRAME_RGB. Applied. JB. -- Julien BLACHE GPG KeyID 0x

[sane-devel] [PATCH] v4l: convert to RGB

2010-11-08 Thread Julien BLACHE
Marc Deslauriers wrote: > Yes, it is unfortunately still needed. libv4l1 maps VIDEO_PALETTE_RGB24 > to V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR24. I tried to fix libv4l1, but was told this is > legacy behaviour that cannot be changed. See the following thread: Oh crap. If I had time to lose, I'd be making a point about

[sane-devel] [PATCH] v4l: convert to RGB

2010-11-08 Thread Julien BLACHE
Marc Deslauriers wrote: Hi, > Attached is a patch for the sane-backends v4l driver. When asking v4l1 > for RGB, it actually returns BGR and applications are expected to adjust > appropriately. That shouldn't be needed with libv4l, have you checked that this isn't a bug somewhere else? JB. --

[sane-devel] How to handle devices with multiple USB bulk-in endpoints

2010-11-08 Thread m. allan noah
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > Am Dienstag, 2. November 2010, um 01:24:38 schrieb m. allan noah: >> I've not had a chance to look at the code, but i can say that this >> design is preferred over a new argument to the open() function, >> because some scanner might somed

[sane-devel] [PATCH] v4l: convert to RGB

2010-11-08 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Hi, On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 12:26 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Marc Deslauriers wrote: > > Attached is a patch for the sane-backends v4l driver. When asking v4l1 > > for RGB, it actually returns BGR and applications are expected to adjust > > appropriately. > > That shouldn't be needed with libv4

[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or > scanimage

2010-11-08 Thread Myroslav Kavatsyuk
e puzzled since I can't see this error > message in scanimage > > source code. Doing a " grep -r recognised * " on all > SANE sources show no such > > message. What am I missing ? > > > > Regards, > > ? ? ? ?Stef > > > > -- > > sane-de