[sane-devel] scanimage batch pipe

"m. allan noah" wrote: Hi, > Long-term, scanadf should be deprecated, so an alternative > implementation for scanimage would be considered. Do you have > suggestions for an alternative design Julien? Yes, timing is on our side for once ;)

[sane-devel] scanimage batch pipe

"Roberto A. Foglietta" wrote: Hi, > Could someone tell me why it was refused, please? scanadf implements this already, and the patch uses popen(). > Does someone know any reason to not apply that patch? The patch uses popen(). JB. -- Julien BLACHE

[sane-devel] scanimage batch pipe

Hi to all, I am writing here to ask about this patch http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2006-September/017711.html It is pretty old but interesting and I did not found that features implemented in actual scanimage roberto at napoleone:~/mio$ scanimage -V scanimage (sane-back

[sane-devel] scanimage batch pipe

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Julien BLACHE wrote: > "Roberto A. Foglietta" wrote: > > Hi, > >> ?Could someone tell me why it was refused, please? > > scanadf implements this already, and the patch uses popen(). > >> ?Does someone know any reason to not apply that patch? > > The patch uses pop

[sane-devel] HP Scanjet G4010

Le Tuesday 05 October 2010 15:28:28 Brian Shaver, vous avez ?crit : > Stef, > Obtained the latest git source code. The G4010 is detected. scanimage > --test passes. However, trying both Color and Gray modes all I get back > scanimage is a solid black image. > > I'll keep looking around for more in