On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Dale Callaham wrote:
> My question. Is this thinking on track? Does this sound reasonable?
yes- this is easily doable with SANE. The protocol itself is pretty
simple. The only complicated part is the option handling code, which
can make up 50% of the code on many
Hi, I'm not subscribed yet but just wanted to get some general direction
from experienced people about the practicality of what I am planning. I
have read through some of the info and just wanted a reality check if
what I am thinking is possible or reasonable.
I work in science and formerly bui
Le Saturday 02 October 2010 19:33:18 chris guirl, vous avez ?crit :
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:31 PM, stef wrote:
> >forgot to check that your scanner was supported by the lexmark
> > backend. Is it the case ? Sometimes scanners are merely relabeled
> > models.
>
> I don't know. On sane
Le Saturday 02 October 2010 11:25:07 Brian Shaver, vous avez ?crit :
> Hello,
> I've got an HP Scanjet G4010.
>
> I'd like to offer to assist with developing a backend for this model. If
> I'm not mistaken, it looks like this is being actively worked on
> currently. Does someone know the status of
