[sane-devel] Canon PIXMA MX870

2010-07-22 Thread Matthias Pannek
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:20:30 +0200 Nicolas Martin wrote: > Note sure either what it means, but after some googling, it looks > linked to some versions of kernel > > Did you try to modprobe -r the modules usblp and usb_storage ? Thanks, compiled a new kernel with usb_storage as modul and now i h

[sane-devel] Canon PIXMA MX870

2010-07-22 Thread Nicolas Martin
gt;> > In the meantime, I'll commit those first changes for MX870, this will >> > be easier then to investigate the ADF empty issue >> >> Thanks :-) >> >> Matthias >> > > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100722/4ab9d9f5/attachment.htm>

[sane-devel] Canon PIXMA MX870

2010-07-22 Thread Nicolas Martin
commit those first changes for MX870, this will > > be easier then to investigate the ADF empty issue > > Thanks :-) > > Matthias > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100722/595ca4c2/attachment.htm>

[sane-devel] dell aio 926

2010-07-22 Thread Yves Jeanrenaud
I will upgrade the backend. Wonder why my debian repositroy supplied such an old package. I would make you a log of the scanner, if you advise me how to. yes it is a strongARM device with debian lenny on it. yves 2010/7/22 m. allan noah : > Some points/questions- > > 1. This version of sane-back

[sane-devel] Xerox Travel Scanner 100 under Red Hat

2010-07-22 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
Jane85 schrieb: > > > > Pierre Willenbrock-2 wrote: >> >> >> Okay, i am officially out of ideas. To me, this looks very much like >> defective hardware. >> >> Does this scanner work with any other systems, for example with the >> original Windows driver? >> >> Regards, >> Pierre >> >> > > The

[sane-devel] Canon PIXMA MX870

2010-07-22 Thread Matthias Pannek
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 07:45:52 +0200 Nicolas Martin wrote: > > Yeah, i can try it with via USB. Any special parameter needed for > > that? > > Nothing special, test it the same way as you did with network > connexion. > USB might require you to set some perms or udev rule tweak, so that > you can

[sane-devel] dell aio 926

2010-07-22 Thread m. allan noah
Some points/questions- 1. This version of sane-backends is ancient, I recommend an upgrade. 2. It appears that this scanner (and it's Lexmark version) is not currently supported 3. Perhaps you can get a log of this machine scanning under windows? Stef might be able to determine if it compatible wi

[sane-devel] dell aio 926

2010-07-22 Thread Yves Jeanrenaud
Oh I see. sorry for beeing so naive. here is the output: This is sane-find-scanner from sane-backends 1.0.19 # sane-find-scanner will now attempt to detect your scanner. If the # result is different from what you expected, first make sure your # scanner is powered up and properly connec

[sane-devel] Canon PIXMA MX870

2010-07-22 Thread Nicolas Martin
Le jeudi 22 juillet 2010 ? 00:05 +0200, Matthias Pannek a ?crit : > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:23:16 +0200 > Nicolas Martin wrote: > > > Yes, there was an error in the limiting to 600 dpi formula, hopefully, > > should be fixed in the new file attached. > > Works fine now. Ok > > > So I've canceled

[sane-devel] Xerox Travel Scanner 100 under Red Hat

2010-07-22 Thread Daniel Elm
There is a chance it's a USB problem. Some laptops have ports that don't provide enough power to USB driven devices like this, even though they're supposed to. Additionally, my experience has been that with many desktops, the front side ports will see enough wear and damage (both physical and fro

[sane-devel] Xerox Travel Scanner 100 under Red Hat

2010-07-22 Thread Jane85
Pierre Willenbrock-2 wrote: > > > Okay, i am officially out of ideas. To me, this looks very much like > defective hardware. > > Does this scanner work with any other systems, for example with the > original Windows driver? > > Regards, > Pierre > > The scanner works on another computer

[sane-devel] Canon PIXMA MX870

2010-07-22 Thread Matthias Pannek
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:23:16 +0200 Nicolas Martin wrote: > Yes, there was an error in the limiting to 600 dpi formula, hopefully, > should be fixed in the new file attached. Works fine now. > So I've canceled any Pixma protocol change here, do you have the > possibility to try the same with a u