[sane-devel] Hardware compatibility ongoing problem and what can be done about it

Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:51:24 -0400 From: "m. allan noah" On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:07 AM, augustin wrote: > I believe in wallet advocacy: if we only had a reliable and objective > assessment of the linux-(un)friendliness of hardware manufacturers, Linux > users across the g

[sane-devel] Hardware compatibility ongoing problem and what can be done about it

> A- > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:07 AM, augustin wrote: > >> I believe in wallet advocacy: if we only had a reliable and objective >> assessment of the linux-(un)friendliness of hardware manufacturers, >> Linux >> users across the globe could be encouraged to buy from certain >> manufacturers >>

[sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL

messenger.it/videoconversazioni.aspx -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100618/e2c191b1/attachment.htm>

[sane-devel] Hardware compatibility ongoing problem and what can be done about it

Hello Allan, Thank you very much for your email. Together with yours, I have received 3 useful comments after my second email to the list. First, Colin helped me solve this ticket: http://linux.overshoot.tv/ticket/95 Then Joe reminded me of the Linux Foundation and the Linux Standard Base,

[sane-devel] Hardware compatibility ongoing problem and what can be done about it

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> A- >> >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:07 AM, augustin wrote: >> >>> I believe in wallet advocacy: if we only had a reliable and objective >>> assessment of the linux-(un)friendliness of hardware manufacturers, >>> Linux >>> users across the g

[sane-devel] Hardware compatibility ongoing problem and what can be done about it

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> A- >> >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:07 AM, augustin wrote: >> >>> I believe in wallet advocacy: if we only had a reliable and objective >>> assessment of the linux-(un)friendliness of hardware manufacturers, >>> Linux >>> users across the g

[sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL

lioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" > to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100618/4faeb569/attachment.htm>

[sane-devel] Hardware compatibility ongoing problem and what can be done about it

A- On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:07 AM, augustin wrote: > I believe in wallet advocacy: if we only had a reliable and objective > assessment of the linux-(un)friendliness of hardware manufacturers, Linux > users across the globe could be encouraged to buy from certain manufacturers > rather than fro

[sane-devel] [Regression] libsane-extras doesn't work any more with EPSON PM-A820

2010/4/27 Yann Ubuntu : > (..) >> Yann- you might be in luck. No need to >> install libsane-extras, if you can upgrade libsane to 1.0.21. > > > Thank you all for your answers. > For the moment my scanner works, so I am not in hurry, but I am ok to > check with libsane 1.0.21 . > I saw http://www.sa

[sane-devel] DEB or PPA for Libsane

I have one available here: https://edge.launchpad.net/~robert-ancell/+archive/sane-backends On 08/05/10 19:59, Yann Ubuntu wrote: > Dear all, > > Is there a DEB or a PPA to easily upgrade libsane to 1.0.21 on Ubuntu Lucid ? > > Regards > ~Yann > > -- > sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.