I'm new to Linux and so I am trying to find usable new software as well
as figuring out what I'm doing in Xubuntu. I am not finding a
graphics'scanning program I can readily use. Xsane looks like my best
bet so far but I'm having serious problems with it.
First of all, it will only scan a 2.73
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:48:59AM +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Kurt Rosenfeld
> wrote:
> > Thanks for responding. ?Here is a log of scanimage
> > run as root in Linux, without the -T:
> > http://isis.poly.edu/~kurt/scanimage_debuglevel_21.txt
> > sane-find
Thanks for responding. Here is a log of scanimage
run as root in Linux, without the -T:
http://isis.poly.edu/~kurt/scanimage_debuglevel_21.txt
sane-find-scanner consistently finds the scanner.
I am running it in native Linux and native FreeBSD (two
separate boxes, both running sane-backends 1.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This sounds good and xsane and gscan2pdf recognize the scanner but I
>>>>>> still can't scan. I always get an error message: 'Failed to start
>>>>>> scanner: Operation not supported'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xsane.log
Type: text/x-log
Size: 64311 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100514/7620b2fe/attachment-0001.bin>
xsane and gscan2pdf recognize the scanner but I still
>>>> can't scan. I always get an error message: 'Failed to start scanner:
>>>> Operation not supported'.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xsane.log
Type: text/x-log
Size: 62394 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100514/2e16a95d/attachment-0001.bin>
I get this: http://pastebin.com/uG81XyKn
Am 14.05.2010 14:40, schrieb m. allan noah:
> Try it with the DEBUG flag I gave before...
>
> allan
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:07 AM, kltrg wrote:
>> I added the line and now I get:
>> :~$ scanimage -L
>> device `epson2:libusb:002:008' is a Epson PID
On 05/14/2010 02:33 PM, Grant wrote:
> I tried a few different frontends including Image Scan and they all
> produced the same horizontal lines. Increasing the scan resolution
> from 300dpi to 600dpi prevents the lines from appearing, but Image
> Scan is the only frontend I've found that makes 600
>> I've had a scan server set up for a while which uses saned via xinetd.
>> ?Is there a simpler way to set up a scan server with fewer permissions
>> to grant? ?The configuration seems a lot more complex than my printer
>> server which has only cupsd.conf config on the server and client.conf
>> co
I added the line and now I get:
:~$ scanimage -L
device `epson2:libusb:002:008' is a Epson PID 0851 flatbed scanner
This sounds good and xsane and gscan2pdf recognize the scanner but I still
can't scan. I always get an error message: 'Failed to start scanner: Operation
not supported'.
I don't know the answer but probably the failure is related to this
part of the log file:
[epson2] using built in CCT profile
[epson2] esci_set_color_correction_coefficients
[epson2] esci_set_color_correction_coefficients: not supported
What version of sane-backends are you running? Looking at c
That seems more complete, but now we have to wait for someone with
more experience with epson protocol
allan
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:35 PM, kltrg wrote:
> I started from scratch again, started xsane via the commandline redirecting
> the output to that file, hit preview scan, git the error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grant :
> I've had a scan server set up for a while which uses saned via xinetd.
> Is there a simpler way to set up a scan server with fewer permissions
> to grant? The configuration seems a lot more complex than my printer
> server which has
Can we see a log of scanimage run as root, without the -T?
also- are you running this thing under some kind of VM?
allan
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Kurt Rosenfeld
wrote:
> If anybody has any ideas, I'd love to hear them. ?Otherwise I will
> return the scanner to the store. ?scanimage fail
If anybody has any ideas, I'd love to hear them. Otherwise I will
return the scanner to the store. scanimage fails even when run
as root. thanks, -kurt
- Forwarded message from Kurt Rosenfeld -
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 22:30:47 -0400
From: Kurt Rosenfeld
To: sane-devel at lists.alioth.
> Try this:
>
> SANE_DEBUG_EPSON2=255 scanimage -L
It gives me:
:~$ SANE_DEBUG_EPSON2=255 scanimage -L
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of epson2 to 255.
[epson2] sane_epson2_init: sane-backends 1.0.21cvs
[epson2] epson2 backend, version 1.0.124
[epson2] sane_epson2_get_devices
[epson2] probe_de
I dont see any problems in this file. Are you sure it was not truncated?
allan
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:46 PM, kltrg wrote:
> I attached the logfile to the mail.
>
> Thanks for all you efforts! kltrg
>
> Am 14.05.2010 18:01, schrieb m. allan noah:
>> well, that looks good, do the same when try
>> I tried a few different frontends including Image Scan and they all
>> produced the same horizontal lines. ?Increasing the scan resolution
>> from 300dpi to 600dpi prevents the lines from appearing, but Image
>> Scan is the only frontend I've found that makes 600dpi available.
>> xsane and xscan
> It is possibly just a permissions issue. Try it as root. If that
> works, then we have to update udev/hal rules
'sudo scanimage -L' doesn't work either, so it seems not to be a permission
issue.
Hi folks,
as various distros still have to maintain a lot of patches against
sane, the following paper might be of your interest ...
http://www.metux.de/download/oss-qm-project-2010050101.pdf
cu
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== me
well, that looks good, do the same when trying to scan:
SANE_DEBUG_EPSON2=255 xsane 2>xsane.log
go until it gives you an error, and send the log here (compress it if large)
allan
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, kltrg wrote:
> I get this: http://pastebin.com/uG81XyKn
>
> Am 14.05.2010 14:40,
I'm sorry. I forgot to mention the version. 'scanimage --version' gives me
'scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.20; backend version 1.0.20'.
I now noticed that there is a support page for each version which I didn't see
at all before. Obviously, I need to search for my scanner in
http://www.sane-proj
On 05/14/2010 10:40 AM, Grant wrote:
> Thank you for writing. I'd love to be able to fix this. Is "Image
> Scan!" synonymous with the epkowa backend?
Image Scan! is a frontend for exclusive use with the epkowa backend. It is
developed in tandem with the epkowa backend and available on the Avasy
Try it with the DEBUG flag I gave before...
allan
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:07 AM, kltrg wrote:
> I added the line and now I get:
> :~$ scanimage -L
> device `epson2:libusb:002:008' is a Epson PID 0851 flatbed scanner
>
> This sounds good and xsane and gscan2pdf recognize the scanner but I still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grant :
> The Epson Artisan 710 is listed as unsupported on the SANE website.
> I'm using epkowa instead, but I'm getting horizontal lines with a
> slight rainbow coloring across my scans. Could switching from epkowa
> to epson2 once support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
m. allan noah :
> What version of sane-backends (aka libsane) are you running? Did you
> check our support page for that exact version?
Ubuntu 10.04 ships with sane-backends 1.0.20.
The SX410 was added in sane-backends 1.0.21, to the epson2 b
try adding this string to /etc/sane.d/epson2.conf:
usb 0x04b8 0x0851
allan
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:55 AM, kltrg wrote:
>> Try this:
>>
>> SANE_DEBUG_EPSON2=255 scanimage -L
>
> It gives me:
> :~$ SANE_DEBUG_EPSON2=255 scanimage -L
> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of epson2 to 255.
> [epson
Try this:
SANE_DEBUG_EPSON2=255 scanimage -L
and lets see what that gives.
oh- and is it possible that the updated sane version failed to update
the contents of /etc/sane.d? those config files must match the running
version of sane...
allan
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:44 AM, kltrg wrote:
>> It
It is possibly just a permissions issue. Try it as root. If that
works, then we have to update udev/hal rules
allan
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:00 AM, kltrg wrote:
> I'm sorry. I forgot to mention the version. 'scanimage --version' gives me
> 'scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.20; backend version 1.0
28 matches
Mail list logo
