On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Kluge, Norbert
wrote:
> help needed.
> Can I use the driver sane pixma.5 for the scanner Canon MX870 ?
Dear Norbert,
Great of you to ask! The MX870 is not yet in the supported scanner
list, but if you would like to volunteer to test it, I will be more
than happy
m. allan noah gmail.com> writes:
>
> Nope. That is brother's problem. They don't support us, we don't
> support them. :)
Seriously? Just because Brother provide a binary only driver, you won't list
their USB id's in the libsane udev rules (so that the USB device will get a
working set of perm
m. allan noah gmail.com> writes:
>
> why not try running saned under xinetd, and see if it plays nicer?
No go, but in just ensuring that xinetd was running the server, by using strace
the problem had new light shone on it. The root issue seems to be a
permissions
issue on /usr/local/... brs
m. allan noah gmail.com> writes:
>
Hi,
> Ok- let me first appologize if you took Julien the wrong way. You see,
> any program that uses sane-backends is effectively pulling the
> backends into it's running process, giving it all manner of options to
> screw things up.
Yes, understood, complete
Julien BLACHE jblache.org> writes:
>
> Hi,
Hi,
> Did you contact Brother asking them to contribute the code to their
> driver to SANE?
Of course I did, in the context of the printer driver. There was no point in
talking about the scanner driver once they made their position on their
"propr
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
Hi,
>> That's what you get for using a proprietary backend that isn't properly
>> integrated in the system (udev/consolekit).
>
> So, is this just comment on the permissions issue or the the segfault -- which
> is the original point of this report/thread?
[X] All of the
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Brian J. Murrell
wrote:
> m. allan noah gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Nope. That is brother's problem. They don't support us, we don't
>> support them. :)
>
> Seriously? ?Just because Brother provide a binary only driver, you won't list
> their USB id's in the libsane
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Brian J. Murrell
wrote:
> Thanx for all the help!
No problem. Glad to help.
> P.S. Can you add this printer:
>
> Bus 002 Device 002: ID 04f9:01e9 Brother Industries, Ltd
>
> to the list of printers in the udev rules file. ?It's a Brother DCP-7040.
Nope. That is
why not try running saned under xinetd, and see if it plays nicer?
allan
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Brian J. Murrell
wrote:
> m. allan noah gmail.com> writes:
>>
>
> Hi,
>
>> Ok- let me first appologize if you took Julien the wrong way. You see,
>> any program that uses sane-backends is
> Hi guys
>
> I posted this about a fortnight ago but have not had any response. Can
> anyone help?
Hi,
You may have better luck to get help if you go to HP or Ubuntu. The
software you are using for your device is mainly from HP (hplip) an not
from the sane team - they only are using sane as par
Ok- let me first appologize if you took Julien the wrong way. You see,
any program that uses sane-backends is effectively pulling the
backends into it's running process, giving it all manner of options to
screw things up. In the absence of source code, it can be very
difficult to identify the culpr
I put up this plea for help and had no response but have now solved the
problem (without fully diagnosing it, but never mind that!)
=
My F2280 was working happily both in printing and scanning until some
time in March. I suspect a routine Synaptic Update made an unhelpful
change, although
Dear Sirs,
help needed.
My question is:
Can I use the driver sane pixma.5 for the scanner Canon MX870 ?
Thank you for your help.
Greeting,
--
Kluge, Norbert
Bundesamt f?r Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI)
Referat 211
Godesberger Allee 185
Julien BLACHE jblache.org> writes:
>
> Hi,
Hi,
> That's what you get for using a proprietary backend that isn't properly
> integrated in the system (udev/consolekit).
So, is this just comment on the permissions issue or the the segfault -- which
is the original point of this report/thread?
>
Hi guys
I posted this about a fortnight ago but have not had any response. Can
anyone help?
My F2280 was working happily both in printing and scanning until some
time in March. I suspect a routine Synaptic Update made an unhelpful
change, although I do not use the scanner often enough to be
Sorry, we dont produce the hpaio driver you are using. Perhaps someone
here has run into this problem and can help, but I would try asking
the hplip guys at hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/index.html
allan
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Richard Welch
wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I posted this about a fo
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
Hi,
> FWIW, this is just a perennial, frustratingly-in-every-release-of-Ubuntu
> permission problem. If I run xsane as root, it works just fine, to the local
> device that is, as proof that the brscan3 driver works at least.
That's what you get for using a proprietary
Brian J. Murrell interlinx.bc.ca> writes:
>
> Well, it did back when I posted the original message here. Since then
> I have upgraded to Ubuntu Lucid and now I just get a USB error in a dialog.
FWIW, this is just a perennial, frustratingly-in-every-release-of-Ubuntu
permission problem. If I
m. allan noah gmail.com> writes:
>
> more data: which driver is in use on scanner server,
It's the "brscan3" /usr/lib/sane/libsane-brother3.so.1.0.7 driver.
> and is it the
> same version of sane-backends?
I'd assume so.
> also, what happens if you connect to
> localhost saned on the server?
19 matches
Mail list logo
