chment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20091116/69e3e3cd/attachment.htm>
Hi Allan,
Thanks for your comments.
m. allan noah wrote:
>> We can't use a static rules file because each distro uses slightly different
>> syntax. And even then, we can't keep up with all the changes distros
>> themselves keep making to their udev rules files resulting in breakage
>> nearly ever
Alesh Slovak wrote:
Hi,
> We can't use a static rules file because each distro uses slightly
> different syntax. And even then, we can't keep up with all the changes
> distros themselves keep making to their udev rules files resulting in
> breakage nearly every time a new version of a distro is
Olaf Meeuwissen writes:
> David Heinrich writes:
>
>> I'm using xsane and iscan ("Image Scan") to interface with my Epson V700
>> scanner, and they don't show options for scanning beyond 3200 dpi.
>
> The 3200dpi limitation was lifted in iscan-2.11.0. The latest version
> is 2.22.1, so you may
m. allan noah wrote:
> agreed. I have just had the same discussion in the bug tracker with a
> user of the proprietary brother backend. I think it is time that these
> external drivers started providing their own proper installation,
> instead of relying on us.
Easy for you to say. In reality this
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Alesh Slovak
wrote:
> Hi Allan,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> m. allan noah wrote:
>>>
>>> We can't use a static rules file because each distro uses slightly
>>> different
>>> syntax. And even then, we can't keep up with all the changes distros
>>> themselves
David Heinrich writes:
> I'm using xsane and iscan ("Image Scan") to interface with my Epson V700
> scanner, and they don't show options for scanning beyond 3200 dpi.
The 3200dpi limitation was lifted in iscan-2.11.0. The latest version
is 2.22.1, so you may want to give that a spin ... Packag
