[sane-devel] Xerox Documate 510 Backend

m. allan noah wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Rene Rebe wrote: >>> Brian- I am sorry your query opened such a can of worms, this sort of >>> thing is rather irregular. Perhaps Rene can answer your questions, now >>> that he is here. >> Well, the DM510 ID is in CVS, maybe even the last tar

[sane-devel] Xerox Documate 510 Backend

Wow that did the trick. That was a lot easier than I had expected. Now that I have things working is there a battery of tests that I can run to maybe update the status from unsupported for others reference? To chime in on the version control issue that was discussed in a few earlier messages,

[sane-devel] Xerox Documate 510 Backend

m. allan noah wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Rene Rebe wrote: >> No it isn't. >> On 08.04.2009, at 04:14, m. allan noah wrote: >> >>> judging by the shell, I'd say thats really an Avision machine, very >>> similar to fujitsu 4010CU. The avision backend is in need of a >>> maintainer... >

[sane-devel] Xerox Documate 510 Backend

Rene Rebe wrote: Hi, >> Yeah for that one, but I've got other reports. Need to get back at >> that now that you're back. > > That for one? You count random kernel glitches as backend issues, ... Of course not. I may have mixed up the 7400 and 5300, so I really need to check the reports I got ag

[sane-devel] Xerox Documate 510 Backend

On 08.04.2009, at 11:31, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Rene Rebe wrote: > > Hi, > >> There are 2 7400 flavors and I think booth do work. The other mail on >> the >> list today apparently also boils down to "the linux usb subsystem got >> confused", so? > > Yeah for that one, but I've got other reports.

[sane-devel] Xerox Documate 510 Backend

Rene Rebe wrote: Hi, > There are 2 7400 flavors and I think booth do work. The other mail on > the > list today apparently also boils down to "the linux usb subsystem got > confused", so? Yeah for that one, but I've got other reports. Need to get back at that now that you're back. > I never ha

[sane-devel] Xerox Documate 510 Backend

Hi, On 08.04.2009, at 10:53, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Rene Rebe wrote: > > Hi, > >> I do not know of any bug that needs fixing. Using a proper non-Debian > > You must be kidding. What about the various versions of the HP 7400 > that stopped working after 1.0.18, for a start? I've got an > ADF-rela

[sane-devel] "epkowa" driver installation on Ubuntu 8.10

Hi, > Googling on the Internet, because of the "W: Ignoring Provides line with > DepCompareOp for package iscan-interpreter" issue, I found this. It seems that our plugin packages violate Debian policy. Specifically, we used versions in the Provides line: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/

[sane-devel] Xerox Documate 510 Backend

Rene Rebe wrote: Hi, > I do not know of any bug that needs fixing. Using a proper non-Debian You must be kidding. What about the various versions of the HP 7400 that stopped working after 1.0.18, for a start? I've got an ADF-related bug on the HP 8250 if you'd like, too. > site would also stim

[sane-devel] Xerox Documate 510 Backend

On 08.04.2009, at 10:22, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Rene Rebe wrote: > > Hi, > >> No it isn't. > > Oh, really? We are eagerly waiting for avision bugfixes to start > flowing into CVS. There's a release coming, so now would be a good > time to start. > I do not know of any bug that needs fixing. Usi

[sane-devel] Xerox Documate 510 Backend

Rene Rebe wrote: Hi, > No it isn't. Oh, really? We are eagerly waiting for avision bugfixes to start flowing into CVS. There's a release coming, so now would be a good time to start. *shrug* JB. -- Julien BLACHE

[sane-devel] Xerox Documate 510 Backend

No it isn't. On 08.04.2009, at 04:14, m. allan noah wrote: > judging by the shell, I'd say thats really an Avision machine, very > similar to fujitsu 4010CU. The avision backend is in need of a > maintainer... > > allan > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Bryan Ward wrote: >> I have a Xerox Docu

[sane-devel] HP 7400C trouble addendum

> I rebooted the server and now it works again. Can anyone tell me what > might be the cause of this, or how I can trace what made this reboot > necessary?? modules that can be reloaded or stuff like that. That's a bit difficult to say but USB can be unstable for many different reasons (if it is c

[sane-devel] Xerox Documate 510 Backend

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Rene Rebe wrote: > m. allan noah wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Rene Rebe wrote: >>> >>> No it isn't. >>> On 08.04.2009, at 04:14, m. allan noah wrote: >>> judging by the shell, I'd say thats really an Avision machine, very similar to fujits

[sane-devel] Xerox Documate 510 Backend

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Rene Rebe wrote: > No it isn't. > On 08.04.2009, at 04:14, m. allan noah wrote: > >> judging by the shell, I'd say thats really an Avision machine, very >> similar to fujitsu 4010CU. The avision backend is in need of a >> maintainer... Ah- I am sorry, I made an ass