"m. allan noah" wrote:
> True enough, So, instead of using mktemp at all, why not do something
> like append '.part' to the image name? I think that is a little more
> clear to the end user if they find some hanging around after a
> scanimage crash or something.
Absolutely, especially if this al
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:46 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Mattias Ellert
> wrote:
>> 22 dec 2008 kl. 02.31 skrev m. allan noah:
>>
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Mattias Ellert
wrote:
>
> m?n 2008-12-08 klockan 09:46 -0500 skrev m. allan noah:
>
On 1/14/2009 6:12 PM, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> i tried to build sane with different source and build directories and
> ended up needing the attached patch to tools/Makefile.in. I am not sure
> if i got the build-directory creation right, but it works for different
> source/build dir
"Simon Matter" wrote:
> 3) from what I understand using mktemp() here is not less secure than what
> scanimage does when writing output files anyway.
Your previous mail implies that you're writing to /tmp, which is
another story entirely... If you're not, that's acceptable.
JB.
--
Julien BLAC
> "Simon Matter" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> It creates a temp file using (unsecure) mktemp(3) and writes to it
>
>> Would be nice if that one could go into CVS.
>
> Regardless of anything else in the patch, you know what you have to do
> if you want that to happen
"Simon Matter" wrote:
Hi,
> It creates a temp file using (unsecure) mktemp(3) and writes to it
> Would be nice if that one could go into CVS.
Regardless of anything else in the patch, you know what you have to do
if you want that to happen :-)
JB.
--
debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20090114/77c31834/attachment.bin
On 1/14/2009 12:00 PM, Thibaut GIRKA wrote:
> Hi,
> I bought an Epson SX600FW scanner/printer, and it doesn't work with SANE
> (at least the version in debian/testing).
> When I do "scanimage -L", here is what I get:
> "[epson2] Cannot send this command to a networked scanner"
>
I have recently
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:06 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
> There has been some discussion of moving to some other SCM lately, so
> any branching might want to wait for that, but certainly you could try
> to apply your changes to a current cvs checkout, and at least produce
> a patch?
I have CVS writ
n=E9e?=
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20090114/78bd4d9b/attachment.pgp
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:24 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
> Understood. How complex do you feel your changes were to get the
> sane-backends side working? Reasonable to #ifdef into mainline?
Not really complex but would take some time because the abovementioned
repository based on post-1.0.18 SANE ba
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:51 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
>
> Yes- I had forgotten about that. So now we have dll, net, and fujitsu
> backends, and scanimage natively building?
>
Not with 'fujitsu' backend in the version I've mentioned, however, as
Michael got the success with it, would be easy to me
"m. allan noah" wrote:
> Yes- I had forgotten about that. So now we have dll, net, and fujitsu
> backends, and scanimage natively building?
For some value of "natively" and "building" as far as fujitsu is
concerned, from what I've read. Ugh.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
> 2009/1/13 Michael Cronenworth :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've had success in building sane with MinGW, MSYS, and libusb-win32-0.12.
>> During my initial work I was unable to find much of anything about such a
>> feat as most people settled for Cygwin.
Hi,
I am trying to configure network scanning on this new MFP without
success.
The hp-makeuri tool (from the hplip package) returns:
% hp-makeuri -s 10.0.3.103
error: Device does not support scan.
I have a /etc/sane.d/dll.d/hplip file wich contains:
hpaio
but "scanimag
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "Simon Matter" wrote:
>
>> 3) from what I understand using mktemp() here is not less secure than what
>> scanimage does when writing output files anyway.
True enough, So, instead of using mktemp at all, why not do something
like append '.pa
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:24 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
>> Understood. How complex do you feel your changes were to get the
>> sane-backends side working? Reasonable to #ifdef into mainline?
>
> Not really complex but would take some time bec
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:51 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
>>
>> Yes- I had forgotten about that. So now we have dll, net, and fujitsu
>> backends, and scanimage natively building?
>>
>
> Not with 'fujitsu' backend in the version I've mentioned,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
>> 2009/1/13 Michael Cronenworth :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've had success in building sane with MinGW, MSYS, and libusb-win32-0.12.
>>> During my initial work I was unable to find much of a
Chris Bagwell writes:
> Ah yes, I hadn't thought about looking at iscan source code yet;
> although I'd recently installed the binary to play with on my new
> Epson Artisan 800.
FTR, supported as of iscan-2.14.0.
> I just looked at iscan now and it is indeed a great starting point
> for this ta
2009/1/13 Michael Cronenworth :
> Hello,
>
> I've had success in building sane with MinGW, MSYS, and libusb-win32-0.12.
> During my initial work I was unable to find much of anything about such a
> feat as most people settled for Cygwin.
Excellent news!
> Some caveats:
> 1. I ripped out all backe
21 matches
Mail list logo
