Am Montag, 30. Juni 2008 06:53:34 schrieb stef:
> the only difference I could spot is slightly different motor
> acceleration tables. The ones generated by the backend are very
> close to the ones in windows logs, but in case your scanner's
> motor is less tolerant (or failing ?), it might n
...nice to hear from you
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 at 3:08pm, Ren? Rebe wrote:
RR> The user should not be able to mess the timeouts from the environment.
Actually the user is always able to do _anything_ from the
environment(LD_PRELOAD).
And we do already have SANE_SCSICMD_TIMEOUT and SANE_NET_TIM
Dear allan,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 at 4:46am, m. allan noah wrote:
man> there already is a mechanism for the backend to change the timeout:
man> sanei_usb_set_timeout. which takes precedence, the env var or the
man> backend?
My intention was to only modify sanei_usb_init function. This would cha
Lev A. Melnikovsky wrote:
> ...nice to hear from you
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 at 3:08pm, Ren? Rebe wrote:
>
> RR> The user should not be able to mess the timeouts from the environment.
> Actually the user is always able to do _anything_ from the
> environment(LD_PRELOAD).
>
> And we do already h
Hi,
m. allan noah wrote:
> On 7/15/08, K?re S?rs wrote:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>>
>> On Wednesdayen den 16 July 2008 02:02:36 K?re S?rs wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm a bit confused with the use of sane_cancel(). I noticed today that the
>> > pixma backend requires a sane_cancel after each scan
Hi,
The user should not be able to mess the timeouts from the environment. The
backends should know precisely how long a response takes, especially to
return to the user if the scanner got "stuck".
If one device requires it's own timeouts then go fix the backend to set it.
m. allan noah wrote:
>
On Wednesdayen den 16 July 2008 09:28:49 Nicolas wrote:
> pixma backend can handle batch scan, I've tested it under both xsane and
> scanimage -b :
>
> $ scanimage -b
> Scanning -1 pages, incrementing by 1, numbering from 1
> Scanning page 1
> Scanned page 1. (scanner status = 5)
> Scanning page 2
pixma backend can handle batch scan, I've tested it under both xsane and
scanimage -b :
$ scanimage -b
Scanning -1 pages, incrementing by 1, numbering from 1
Scanning page 1
Scanned page 1. (scanner status = 5)
Scanning page 2
Scanned page 2. (scanner status = 5)
Scanning page 3
Scanned page 3. (s
On 7/16/08, Lev A. Melnikovsky wrote:
> Dear allan,
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 at 4:46am, m. allan noah wrote:
>
> man> there already is a mechanism for the backend to change the timeout:
> man> sanei_usb_set_timeout. which takes precedence, the env var or the
> man> backend?
> My intention w
On 7/16/08, K?re S?rs wrote:
> On Wednesdayen den 16 July 2008 09:28:49 Nicolas wrote:
> > pixma backend can handle batch scan, I've tested it under both xsane and
> > scanimage -b :
> >
> > $ scanimage -b
> > Scanning -1 pages, incrementing by 1, numbering from 1
> > Scanning page 1
> > Sc
Hi again,
On Wednesdayen den 16 July 2008 02:02:36 K?re S?rs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a bit confused with the use of sane_cancel(). I noticed today that the
> pixma backend requires a sane_cancel after each scan (libksane did not work
> correctly with the pixma backend). I have read here on the list:
Hi,
I'm a bit confused with the use of sane_cancel(). I noticed today that the
pixma backend requires a sane_cancel after each scan (libksane did not work
correctly with the pixma backend). I have read here on the list:
"5. be aware that a proper front-end in batch mode will call
sane_start() at
12 matches
Mail list logo
