Frank Zago ha scritto:
> Hello Andrej,
>
> Ralph sent me his code in April but went silent since then. I've
> attached what he send me, so you (or someone else) can start from there.
>
Thanks, I will give a tray.
Andrej
Le Tuesday 10 June 2008 22:50:53 Werner Holtfreter, vous avez ?crit?:
> Am Dienstag, 10. Juni 2008 21:09:58 schrieb stef:
> > > Thanks, this works fine! The starting point at the top of page
> > > varies only between 0,4...0,8.
> > >
> > > But --resolution 100 (I have short tested with others, but
essed
Size: 14932 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080611/7b95f26b/attachment.bin
A month ago, you have post that you have developed a backend for Trust
Imagery 9600SP for sane in which you appointed that you are the only
possessor of an VM6552 device.
In fact this is not true, because there are many possessors of this
device. In fact I don't have such device, but my friend w
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:55:14 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > GPL backend + proprietary decoding libs. A manufacturer would choose
> > compatible terms for this case and it is not forbidden by the GPL.
>
> There are two possibilities here:
>
> 1) the non-free decoding libs are licensed under
Alessandro Zummo writes:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:49:04 +0900
> Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
>> > correct.
>>
>> No so. As per my reply to Johannes' mail:
>>
>> This depends on the respective license conditions of the free and
>> non-free parts. If all of the conditions are not mutually exc
ll me what should I do to output these debug information?
Thank you.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080611/9a91bdcb/attachment.htm
Alessandro Zummo writes:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:00:38 +0200 (CEST)
> Johannes Meixner wrote:
>
>> As far as I see, it seems to be allowed from the legal point
>> of view to have free software that uses non-free libraries
>> because they only say that the program won't be fully usable
>> or not
Johannes Meixner writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Jun 6 16:40 Alessandro Zummo wrote (shortened):
>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FSWithNFLibs
>
> As far as I see, it seems to be allowed from the legal point
> of view to have free software that uses non-free libraries
> because they only say t
the DBG macro only prints if the proper environment var is set:
SANE_DEBUG_BACKENDNAME scanimage -L
but change 'BACKENDNAME' to an all-capital version of your backend name.
allan
On 6/10/08, eagleskycloud wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>I look up the , and I also refer to the backends
> wrote by othe
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:49:04 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > correct.
>
> No so. As per my reply to Johannes' mail:
>
> This depends on the respective license conditions of the free and
> non-free parts. If all of the conditions are not mutually exclusive,
> then there is no problem l
11 matches
Mail list logo
