[sane-devel] Support for CanoScan 8400F (GL841)

2008-05-27 Thread Greg Wyatt
ding, as I do own this scanner... hence I might be able to at least answer device questions. Best Regards, --Greg -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080527/7dc57597/attachment.htm

[sane-devel] Problem with libusb and 64 bits 2.6.25 kernel

2008-05-27 Thread Nicolas
Le mardi 27 mai 2008 ? 16:24 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit : > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Nicolas > wrote: > > > > Le mardi 27 mai 2008 ? 15:42 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit : > >> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Nicolas > >> wrote: > >> > Le lundi 26 mai 2008 ? 19:12 -0400, m. allan noah

[sane-devel] Problem with libusb and 64 bits 2.6.25 kernel

2008-05-27 Thread Nicolas
Le mardi 27 mai 2008 ? 15:42 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit : > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Nicolas > wrote: > > Le lundi 26 mai 2008 ? 19:12 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit : > >> two random thoughts- > >> > >> 1. can he try 32 bit kernel on same exact machine, just to rule out > >> hardware pr

[sane-devel] Problem with libusb and 64 bits 2.6.25 kernel

2008-05-27 Thread Nicolas
Le lundi 26 mai 2008 ? 19:12 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit : > two random thoughts- > > 1. can he try 32 bit kernel on same exact machine, just to rule out > hardware problems? Good point, and to try other USB ports on the same machine, that needs to be confirmed first as it could be a HW issue >

[sane-devel] Question on scanimage -f

2008-05-27 Thread Dieter Jurzitza
Dear listmembers, I did not see the previous posting from M. Allan Noah, but in general I totally agree with Johannes Meixner: if one introduces such an option (what I would consider positive) the backward compatibility should not be broken. The only thing I am worried in this regard is whether i

[sane-devel] Question on scanimage -f

2008-05-27 Thread m. allan noah
On 5/27/08, Dieter Jurzitza wrote: > Dear listmembers, > I did not see the previous posting from M. Allan Noah, but in general I > totally agree with Johannes Meixner: if one introduces such an option (what I > would consider positive) the backward compatibility should not be broken. > The onl

[sane-devel] Problem with libusb and 64 bits 2.6.25 kernel

2008-05-27 Thread m. allan noah
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Nicolas wrote: > > Le mardi 27 mai 2008 ? 15:42 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit : >> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Nicolas >> wrote: >> > Le lundi 26 mai 2008 ? 19:12 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit : >> >> two random thoughts- >> >> >> >> 1. can he try 32 bit kerne

[sane-devel] Problem with libusb and 64 bits 2.6.25 kernel

2008-05-27 Thread m. allan noah
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Nicolas wrote: > Le lundi 26 mai 2008 ? 19:12 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit : >> two random thoughts- >> >> 1. can he try 32 bit kernel on same exact machine, just to rule out >> hardware problems? > > Good point, and to try other USB ports on the same machine, that

[sane-devel] Question on scanimage -f

2008-05-27 Thread Johannes Meixner
Hello, On May 25 07:48 m. allan noah wrote (shortened): > it would seem that a better long-term choice would be to correct > scanimage to output a \n after each scanner? And how can I then get the output in one single line? (without using "tr -d '\n'" ;-) It would break backward compatibility.