Lei Chen wrote:
Hi,
>> agreed. if i were to make sane2 myself, i would change the license to
>> straight GPL3.
>
> Why not LGPL? Is LGPL not so straight for libraries and dynamic
> objects? The current license makes thing complex. People have to pay
> close attention to GPL libraries and backend
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080408/df73ccac/attachment.htm
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Lei Chen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> >> agreed. if i were to make sane2 myself, i would change the license to
> >> straight GPL3.
> >
> > Why not LGPL? Is LGPL not so straight for libraries and dynamic
> > objects? The current license makes t
Julien BLACHE writes:
> Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>> Not exactly free by my book, I'm sorry but it really does make a
>>> difference.
>>
>> As free as the epkowa backend software is concerned, it is free. The
>> fact that it does not support all the scanner models you would like it
>> t
