Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:09:20 -0500
From: "m. allan noah"
On Jan 25, 2008 4:36 PM, wrote:
it does not immediately hit any of our known chipset tests. that does
not mean much however, as we cant test for everything. the next steps
are to open the scanner and get some chip inf
Corrie PARSONSON schrieb:
> Can whatever you're doing for the 600F be applied to the 500F?
I don't think so. 600F and 500F sounds to be nearly the same but
internal they are not. 600F has 2 USB endpoints and 500F has 3 USB
endpoints. The protocol is also very different. 500F uses control
messag
On 1/25/08, Randolph, Scott wrote:
> Here is the entry I added for my MFC6800 Brother multi-function device
> (scanner/copier/printer) for use with SANE.
>
> Note that the Brother web site recommends adding an entry with NO product
> ID, just the vendor ID. Would this be a catch-all way of gettin
On Friday 25 January 2008, m. allan noah wrote:
>
> > I browsed through the sane listings last night. My scanner criteria are:
> > - flatbed
> > - automatic document feeder, duplex, >= 50 pages
> > - costs under 1k$
> >
> > I discovered that
> > - There are many scanners on the market of this form
On Jan 25, 2008 4:36 PM, wrote:
> I append the results of my sane-find-scanner run. It does find a scanner,
> reporting
> found USB scanner (vendor=0x03f0, product=0x3905) at libusb:001:016
>
> Similarly, lsusb says:
> Bus 001 Device 016: ID 03f0:3905 Hewlett-Packard
>
> I searched the s
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:22:39 -0500
> From: "m. allan noah"
>
> On Jan 24, 2008 11:39 AM, wrote:
> > I've got an HP 8270 scanner. It looks very nice. But when I plug it
> > into my 64bit Ubuntu system, xsane doesn't see it. And I note that it
> > isn't listed on the list of supported device
endor}=="04f9", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0111", MODE="664",
GROUP="scanner"
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080125/bfcd1335/attachment.htm
