===
== Neuer Eintrag
===
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---
1. Your email address:
'CypherPunk at fuse.net'
2. Manufacturer (e.g.
Hi!
Did somebody know why a scanner needs 5 gamma tables?
In calibration I found 5 tables which were set before scanning is
invoked. I first thought I would find 3 tables for R,G and B.
But why are there 5 ???
Does somebody know?
--
Ciao
J?rgen
Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the q
Hi,
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 15:38:26 m. allan noah wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2008 6:14 AM, Ren? Rebe wrote:
> > On 23.01.2008, at 02:47, m. allan noah wrote:
> > > Note #1:
> > > This will be (hopefully) the last release of the SANE 1.0 series. The
> > > next release of SANE will be extended (in a
I finally found a solution in the Ubuntu forums
(http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=199147).
I had to change the group in '/etc/inetd.conf' to 'scanner':
sane-port stream tcp nowait saned.scanner /usr/local/sbin/saned saned
Now the scanner gets detected on the remote host, both as
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:14:08 +0100
Ren? Rebe wrote:
>
> I find this alarming for two different reasons. First of all SANE
> already
> historically had a slow release cycle and it should not follow other
> projects
> into slow and ever breaking development.
slow? it wasn't slow, it was froz
Ren? Rebe wrote:
Hi,
>> No progress made on the avision front, and there's another regression
>> in the pixma backend that needs to be fixed too.
>
> Need is a quite heavy word, this probably should be more a should
> or would be nice to have fixed.
Regressions need to be fixed, because they're
Hi,
On 23.01.2008, at 02:47, m. allan noah wrote:
> Slightly later than the timetable announced on 2007-11-16,
> sane-backends is now in code freeze. After code freeze only
> documentation updates and fixes of grave bugs that render a backend
> completely unusable or break compilation are accepte
Any ideas guys?
allan
On Jan 23, 2008 11:52 AM, Jerzy Jalocha N wrote:
> Allan, thank you for your quick response!
>
> I tested it twice. Without the '-d128' option, the scanner does not
> get detected in the client, but it always does with the '-d128' option
> enabled.
>
> I can send debugging
On 23.01.2008, at 10:12, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "m. allan noah" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> The remaining event (may move a few days if required):
>> 2008-02-03 Release sane-backends-1.0.19
>
> No progress made on the avision front, and there's another regression
> in the pixma backend that needs to be
On Jan 23, 2008 11:13 AM, Ren? Rebe wrote:
> > > > Note #2:
> > > > The epson backend has joined our growing list of unmaintained
> > > > backends. As the SANE API matures in a future releases of SANE, these
> > > > backends could be dropped due to lack of support. If you have access
> > > > to s
I have an Epson Stylus CX3000 all-in-one which works perfectly on the
local machine with the CX4000 scanner driver. But on a client host, it
does not get detected after correct setup. (Checked that several
times.)
I followed all the instructions in
http://penguin-breeder.org/sane/saned/ and it ge
"m. allan noah" wrote:
Hi,
> The remaining event (may move a few days if required):
> 2008-02-03 Release sane-backends-1.0.19
No progress made on the avision front, and there's another regression
in the pixma backend that needs to be fixed too.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE
can you get a debug log, after a fresh boot of the scanner and the
machine, by running the following all on one line:
SANE_DEBUG_HP=255 scanimage -L 2>hp4100.log
then post hp4100.log back to the list. i've cc'd the backend author,
he might have some ideas.
allan
On Jan 22, 2008 11:57 PM, Bill M
On Jan 23, 2008 6:14 AM, Ren? Rebe wrote:
> On 23.01.2008, at 02:47, m. allan noah wrote:
> > Note #1:
> > This will be (hopefully) the last release of the SANE 1.0 series. The
> > next release of SANE will be extended (in a backwards compatible
> > fashion) to support more features of modern scan
Hi,
Does the epson2 backend also support the scanners supported by the
unmaintained epson backend? Or does it mean that we have scanners not
maintained any more?
/K?re
On Wednesday 23 January 2008, m. allan noah wrote:
> Note #2:
> The epson backend has joined our growing list of unmaintained
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:21:57 +0200
K?re S?rs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does the epson2 backend also support the scanners supported by the
> unmaintained epson backend? Or does it mean that we have scanners not
> maintained any more?
it should, it has been derived from the epson driver.
--
Best
16 matches
Mail list logo
