Hi list,
since I don't really like Samsung's binary Linux driver for SCX-4200
(which btw. works fine for me), and since it won't work on a mipsel box
(openwrt distro) - and I got no answer on this from Samsung, I've
decided to reverse engineer the protocol - which is, fortunately, quite
trivial.
my flags from backend/Makefile (generated by stock configure)
CFLAGS = -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wcast-align -Wcast-qual
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wreturn-type -Wstrict-prototypes -pedantic -ansi
not sure why yours are not the same?
ok, current code recompiled on older
ing.
Mattias
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1438 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20071120/f5b48717/attachment.bin
jazz_johnson at verizon.net a ?crit :
> On Tuesday 20 November 2007, Mattias Ellert wrote:
>
>> 20 nov 2007 kl. 12.32 skrev Volker Grabsch:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:36:20AM -0500, m. allan noah wrote:
>>>
ok, lets start by saying that lots of other sane backends produce
On Tuesday 20 November 2007, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2007 3:51 PM, wrote:
> > Are there any option I need to pass to configure or gcc
> > in order to generate the C90/C99 warnings?
> > I've compiled hs2p backend on both a Pentium3 x86 and
> > an amd64 x86_64 platform but can't seem to g
On Tuesday 20 November 2007, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> 20 nov 2007 kl. 12.32 skrev Volker Grabsch:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:36:20AM -0500, m. allan noah wrote:
> >> ok, lets start by saying that lots of other sane backends produce
> >> warnings, and i am probably running a newer version of gcc
cess to my 64 bit machine til latter, but attached
is the log from the 32 bit compiler above with your latest patch.
looks pretty good, just a couple of issues.
allan
--
"The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hs2p.log
Type: text/x-log
Size: 1024 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20071120/59de3f8a/attachment.bin
Am Dienstag, 20. November 2007 14:01:05 schrieb m. allan noah:
> On 11/20/07, Johannes Meixner wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Nov 19 15:38 m. allan noah wrote (shortened):
> > > why are you trying to use the -T?
> >
> > I thought "scanimage -d... -T" is the right way to do a test?
> >
> > I use
On Monday 19 November 2007, m. allan noah wrote:
> oops- with patch this time.
>
> On Nov 19, 2007 3:33 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
> > ok, lets try this again. i should have listened to the reversed patch
> > complaints :)
> >
> > this is your current master patch, i guess no need to apply the _new
JSane supports 1bit mode.
On Tuesday 20 November 2007, m. allan noah wrote:
> all the common front-ends can handle the 1 bit mode, where 8 pixels
> are packed into 1 byte.
>
> allan
>
> On 11/20/07, JKD wrote:
> > Hello developers,
> >
> > Could anybody tell me if 1 bit depth (lineart scan) is us
Hello,
On Nov 19 15:38 m. allan noah wrote (shortened):
> why are you trying to use the -T?
I thought "scanimage -d... -T" is the right way to do a test?
I use it in the YaST scanner config tool to provide a [Test] option
for the user to test if his scanner/backend combination works.
Should I
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:36:20AM -0500, m. allan noah wrote:
> ok, lets start by saying that lots of other sane backends produce
> warnings, and i am probably running a newer version of gcc than you,
> so it's not a requirement that we remove all of them. it's just a pet
> peev of mine.
>
> 1. i
bbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20071120/ec620ee4/attachment.pgp
On Nov 20, 2007 10:11 AM, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 20. November 2007 14:01:05 schrieb m. allan noah:
>
> > On 11/20/07, Johannes Meixner wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Nov 19 15:38 m. allan noah wrote (shortened):
> > > > why are you trying to use the -T?
> > >
> > > I thoug
Am Montag, 19. November 2007 18:30:49 schrieb Guillermo Espertino:
> Good news!
> It worked.
Great ;)
> I made some changes though. First, I had a problem: If I uninstalled
> libsane before compiling, it uninstalled xsane, and when I re-installed
> xsane, it installed again libsane, overwriting
all the common front-ends can handle the 1 bit mode, where 8 pixels
are packed into 1 byte.
allan
On 11/20/07, JKD wrote:
> Hello developers,
>
> Could anybody tell me if 1 bit depth (lineart scan) is usually supported in
> most frontends or it should be better to generate a B&W representation u
On 11/20/07, Johannes Meixner wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Nov 19 15:38 m. allan noah wrote (shortened):
> > why are you trying to use the -T?
>
> I thought "scanimage -d... -T" is the right way to do a test?
>
> I use it in the YaST scanner config tool to provide a [Test] option
> for the user to tes
===
== Neuer Eintrag
===
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---
1. Your email address:
'heinoundhannelore at t-online.de'
2. Manufactu
18 matches
Mail list logo
