ForceTeam NNLUG
www.forceteam.nnov.ru
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20070807/17ca86ed/attachment-0001.htm
Hello Everyone
I would like to know if support for the scanner canon lide 600f is
planned? It's a very good scanner. tried it on windows.
Thanks in advance
Sapir
Hi,
I did earlier today report a problem to fedora at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251096 and it has
since been resolved as not a bug, and they make a good case.
Read http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/gccintro/gccintro_70.html
which says that the default behaviour on
> I don't know how to write a backend. ;-(
> How can I help to find out which chipset it uses?
see:
http://www.sane-project.org/contrib.html
which provides some tips to look within the documentation/drivers
supplied with the scanner.
When there is a lack of documentation about a scanner, the p
does it work at all with scanimage?
allan
On 8/7/07, David Campbell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The SANE Canon N670U driver has a status of "complete" on the sane web
> site, but the behaviour I'm seeing is seriously broken.
>
> I'm using SANE as found in the fedora 7 distribution with sane version
> 1.0.1
Hi everybody,
Since several years, the main FTP server for SANE was located on
rpm.org. As rpm.org was decommissioned, the main SANE FTPserver was
moved. It's now located on alioth.debian.org (same as the HTTP and
mail servers).
If you encounter problems when downloading SANE, please write to thi
Hi,
On 2007-08-07 01:10, cgi-mailer at kundenserver.de wrote:
> 1. Your email address:
>'jonas at beatboxbooking.dk'
> 2. Manufacturer (e.g. "Mustek"):
>'Genius'
> 3. Model name (e.g. ScanExpress 1200UB):
>'CP-SF600'
This scanner shopuld work with the gt68xx backend. However, you need
Le mardi 07 ao?t 2007, David Campbell a ?crit?:
> Hi,
>
> I've been experiencing an infinite loop with xsane when it is starting
> up when using the hp5590 driver. I'm seeing it both in the head version
> of the fedora 7 distribution, and when I build xsane from source.
>
> If you set XSANE_DEBUG
Hello Sapir,
No sane support is in development currently.
The chipset is unknown; see
http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/canon-lide-600.html
Support is usually initiated by a developer creating additional
backend code, and then
maintaining that. An invitation to develop is available...
On Montag, 6. August 2007, S Blok wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a CanoScan N650U scanner.
> Xsane recognizes is and I selected it as the scanner to use.
> But when I try to scan I get an error message:
>
> xsane 0.991 "N650U/N656U:002" is not responding.
>
> Thanks for your help.
Could you pls. provide s
On Sonntag, 5. August 2007, rami yarkoni wrote:
> hi
>
> i have an umax 3400 scanner
> and i am working with ubuntu 7.4
> the scanner dose not turn the lamp on
> way ?
please try the latest CVS snapshot, the problem should
be fixed there.
Gerhard
Hello,
on the SANE homepage, I saw that the HP ScanJet 7400c is supported by
the avision backend *in build 201* (or above, I assume).
Now, how do I find out which build I have?
I still haven't resolved the issue, the scanner is basically unusable
on the machine since it is unpredictable when
Hi,
I've been experiencing an infinite loop with xsane when it is starting
up when using the hp5590 driver. I'm seeing it both in the head version
of the fedora 7 distribution, and when I build xsane from source.
If you set XSANE_DEBUG in the environment to 1000, then you can see it
doing thi
Hello,
On Aug 7 12:08 Andreas Pape wrote (shortened):
> Kyocera Mita FS-1116MFP
See
http://www.kyoceramita.de/index/produkte/product/fs1116mfp.technical_specification.html
"Host-Based Printing System (GDI)"
and
http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:GDI_Printers
what this means.
> FS-1118MFP
Acording the
Hello everyone,
planning to operate my new laptop only with linux I'd like to know
whether it makes sense to buy a Kyocera Mita FS-1116MFP, one of
thingies, that's able to do everything aside making coffee ...
I guess printing won't be a big problem with cups, but what about
the scanner part of i
David Campbell wrote:
Hi,
> I stripped it down to a little snippet of code, and you can see that
> this program below gives a different result when compiled with -O2 than
> it does when compiled without -O2. Also, if you uncomment the print
> statements below, you get different behaviour.
P
===
== Neuer Eintrag
===
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---
1. Your email address:
'jonas at beatboxbooking.dk'
2. Manufacturer (e
17 matches
Mail list logo
