z des connaissances, des opinions et des exp?riences des internautes sur
Yahoo! Questions/R?ponses.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20070122/567f6d81/attachment.html
From bobpricem...@hotmai
Hello sane devs,
the first public release of tiffscan
is available at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/tiffscan
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
Am Sonntag, 21. Januar 2007 21:47 schrieb Jochen Eisinger:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure this is really a CCD scanner. You could try the cis1200
> driver, maybe that helps?
>
The cis1200 driver worked perfectly. Thanks, Jochen.
The documentation however, states the Cybercom 9352 is a 300 dpi CCD, not a
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:26:15 -0600
"Clarence Risher" wrote:
> wouldnt the method be the same as for any other monochrome image?
> assume your IR is monochromatic.
>
> On 1/21/07, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> > while working with infrared support I just noticed there
> > seems to be no availa
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 04:12:03PM +0100, Marc Hansen wrote:
> Hi,
> I have the problem, that my scanner does not go back to the startposition and
> stop working.
> After a next scan under windows it does work again.
>
> Does anybody have a hint. The newest sane and plustek-drivers are installed.
On 1/22/07, abel deuring wrote:
> m. allan noah wrote:
>
> >> All this does not mean that the frontend cannot let the user select
> >> a smaller scan window within the page area -- but the clipping of
> >> the image must be done by the frontend.
> >>
> >
> > i agree completely other than the last
m. allan noah wrote:
>> All this does not mean that the frontend cannot let the user select
>> a smaller scan window within the page area -- but the clipping of
>> the image must be done by the frontend.
>>
>
> i agree completely other than the last sentence. it should be possible
> for the backe
On 1/22/07, abel deuring wrote:
> m. allan noah wrote:
>
> >> > But back to the problem I have/had with Etienne's suggstion for the
> >> > "relations" between page size and scan window coordinates: It does
> >> > not make much sense to allow to set a scan window in overscan mode:
> >> > The backen
m. allan noah wrote:
>> > But back to the problem I have/had with Etienne's suggstion for the
>> > "relations" between page size and scan window coordinates: It does
>> > not make much sense to allow to set a scan window in overscan mode:
>> > The backend should calculate the scan window settings
Hi,
I have the problem, that my scanner does not go back to the startposition and
stop working.
After a next scan under windows it does work again.
Does anybody have a hint. The newest sane and plustek-drivers are installed.
Regards
Marc
Hello,
first of all: I didn't follow the whole thread because I thought
that a "failing make" is not of interest for me.
On Jan 19 21:00 Gerhard Jaeger wrote (shortened):
> On Friday 19 January 2007 15:31, Johannes Meixner wrote:
> > On Jan 19 15:00 Julien Michielsen wrote (shortened):
> > > san
rg/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20070122/14116d8f/attachment.pgp
From kitno...@gmail.com Mon Jan 22 14:43:25 2007
From: kitno...@gmail.com (m. allan noah)
Date: Mon Jan 22 14:50:42 2007
Subject: [sane-devel] Well known option consensus
In-Reply-To: <1169466263.5734.1.camel@thilivren>
Refere
> Unfortunately, I don't. However, the fact that the backend gets a
> fatal error immediately after it has re-initialised the device might
> indicate there is something wrong with the device. Maybe the lock is
> on? Does it work on that other OS (assuming you have access so you
> can check)?
>
wouldnt the method be the same as for any other monochrome image?
assume your IR is monochromatic.
On 1/21/07, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> while working with infrared support I just noticed there
> seems to be no available algorithm for dust removal...
>
> anyone can point to some source code o
Allan,
>> It might be better if the backend tells the frontend, if scan window
>> coordinates are relative to the entire scan area or to the selected
>> page size.
>>
>
> abel- i tried this a few weeks ago with my 4120C2, and found that i also
> had to
> increase the paper size (lie to the scanne
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:37:25 +0100
Bertrik
> I've had the same problems too.
>
> Isn't it somehow fundamentally wrong to require kernel headers for sane?
> Sane is a user-space package not kernel-space.
>
> I remember seeing the compilation problem only with the epson backend,
> but surely other
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:59:49 +0100
Mattias Ellert wrote:
> fre 2007-01-19 klockan 20:03 -0600 skrev Robert Price:
> > Thanks but I do have the headers installed. It was a new kernel build and
> > I
> > leave the source files. It apparently isn't looking in the right place. I
> > may try to
On 1/21/07, abel deuring wrote:
> ?tienne Bersac wrote:
>
> > \section{Papersize}
> >
> > When using an Automatic Document Feeder, the user generally cannot
> > preview. If the page being scanned is smaller than the maximum size
> > supported by the hardware/backend, the frontend cannot de
?tienne Bersac wrote:
> \section{Papersize}
>
> When using an Automatic Document Feeder, the user generally cannot
> preview. If the page being scanned is smaller than the maximum size
> supported by the hardware/backend, the frontend cannot determine
> the location of the document on t
Henrik Lundberg writes:
> Hello,
Hi,
> I am trying to get an Epson Perfection 1640SU to work under Debian Etch.
> I'm using udev and the device file shows up as it should, and the epson
> and epkowa backends detects the scanner:
That's what I use as my primary development environment but I hav
20 matches
Mail list logo
