Hi everybody,
On 2006-12-15 17:57, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
>since there seems to be interest in developing sane2, I've decided
> to start this thread in order to collect the commitment of each developer.
[...]
Could we please move the SANE2 (and any sane-standard related) topics
to the san
Hi,
Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> I'd appreciate if everyone who is interested can reply
> with their own commitments for the 2007.. ehm.. sane2 :)
I'm quite surprised to hear there is a sane2 standard - at least one
that we can easily start to implement.
I don't think it's a good idea to start ha
Allen,
m. allan noah wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Lonny Granstrom wrote:
>
2. Help messages for -x, -y, --pagewidth, & --pageheight do NOT
provide proper
information, descriptions are all the same.
>>>
>>> what messages do they provide? my copy says:
>>>
>>> -x 0..224.846mm
Hi,
On 2006-12-17 12:49, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> One thing: I'd like to see Hennings opinion here! And we should
> agree on some version of the SANE2 standard...
Unfortunately I'm very busy and can't do any work related to SANE2 in
the near future. I'd really appreciate a new effort in this direc
Hi,
On 2006-12-17 16:43, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> in general I'd say: yes you are right. But on the other hand I don't see
> any real progress since years regarding SANE2 - so the question is:
> Stay/stuck on SANE1 w/o any chance to enhance support for recent devices OR
> start with a standard that
Thanks for the link,
See it sounds like you want to make the same mistakes, instead of
looking for a better way to organise scanning in linux your looking at
how to better organise functionality in sane.
The problem is that the way scanning is organised is crack-pot and out
dated. we are duplicat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alessandro Zummo wrote:
>
> Hello developers,
>
>since there seems to be interest in developing sane2, I've decided
> to start this thread in order to collect the commitment of each developer.
>
> I'm willing to port the epson driver to sane2
My point of view is that it is better to identify the problems you
wish to solve my creating a new version of sane that the current
version of sane can not be developed into.
The first problem I've noted with sane is that it is a little bit all
mixed up, detection mixed with scaning, paraport mixe
On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 19:37 +0100, Frank Zago wrote:
> Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:02:19 +0100
> > Jochen Eisinger wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'd appreciate if everyone who is interested can reply
> >>> with their own commi
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:25:01 +0100
Frank Zago wrote:
> > so you're saying to declare current sane as stable,
> > fork it and add features to the new tree, making
> > it "morphing" into something that will be the next sane?
> >
> Yes. I think sane1 can evolve into sane2 step by step so as to
Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:33:51 +0100
> Frank Zago wrote:
>
>
>>> some people has committed the time necessary to
>>> port to sane2 the first bunch of drivers.
>>>
>>> we are currently missing coders for
>>> - all of sanei/* (i'll take sanei_tcp)
>>> - the build syst
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:33:51 +0100
Frank Zago wrote:
> > some people has committed the time necessary to
> > port to sane2 the first bunch of drivers.
> >
> > we are currently missing coders for
> > - all of sanei/* (i'll take sanei_tcp)
> > - the build system (configure, makefile et al)
>
Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> Hello developers,
>
>since there seems to be interest in developing sane2, I've decided
> to start this thread in order to collect the commitment of each developer.
>
> I'm willing to port the epson driver to sane2, help porting the
> coolscan driver and handle the
Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:02:19 +0100
> Jochen Eisinger wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Alessandro Zummo wrote:
>>
>>> I'd appreciate if everyone who is interested can reply
>>> with their own commitments for the 2007.. ehm.. sane2 :)
>>>
>> I'm quite surprised to h
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:02:19 +0100
Jochen Eisinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> > I'd appreciate if everyone who is interested can reply
> > with their own commitments for the 2007.. ehm.. sane2 :)
>
> I'm quite surprised to hear there is a sane2 standard - at least one
> that w
the subject says it all, I just managed to obtain
the first image with the epson2 driver.
i need to clean up the code a bit and will commit it
to the cvs soon.
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
On Sunday 17 December 2006 15:02, Jochen Eisinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> > I'd appreciate if everyone who is interested can reply
> > with their own commitments for the 2007.. ehm.. sane2 :)
>
> I'm quite surprised to hear there is a sane2 standard - at least one
> that we can
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:49:04 +0100 (MET)
Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> > I'd appreciate if everyone who is interested can reply
> > with their own commitments for the 2007.. ehm.. sane2 :)
>
> I'll do the plustek stuff (maybe also plustek_pp and u12)
> If needed I'll also check the sanei_thread stuf
On Friday 15 December 2006 21:13, Ilia Sotnikov wrote:
> The patches against sane-backends CVS 12/08/2006, as well as against
> 1.0.18, just posted to SANE bug tracker:
> https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=304254&group_id
>=30186&atid=410366
>
> Comments and critics are wel
On Friday 15 December 2006 17:57, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> Hello developers,
>
>since there seems to be interest in developing sane2, I've decided
> to start this thread in order to collect the commitment of each developer.
>
> I'm willing to port the epson driver to sane2, help porting the
20 matches
Mail list logo
