On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Nick Papadonis wrote:
> Wow, your model is an expensive scanner! Are
> letter/A4 pages aligned when scanner 50 sheet duplex?
>
> The driver appears to support the models below.
> Unfortunately, it's not open source and has a 75 EURO
> licensing fee.
you dont need the scandox
Wow, your model is an expensive scanner! Are
letter/A4 pages aligned when scanner 50 sheet duplex?
The driver appears to support the models below.
Unfortunately, it's not open source and has a 75 EURO
licensing fee.
Thanks
--- Daniel Spannbauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> take a look @ www.scandox.
Lutz wrote:
> now the scanner is seen by scanimage -L -
> but it does not work - if I continue with Lamp error, I finally end up with a
> command sequence error.
> ---
> and her comes the not so nice part
> ---
> [canon] sense cate
Hi,
jurgen.defu...@pandora.be (Jurgen Defurne) writes:
> I am busy trying to get a brand new Epson Perfection 3490 PHOTO at work
> under SANE.
This scanner works quite well with open source snapscan backend.
Have you tried it?
--
Krzysztof Halasa
Am Donnerstag, 17. August 2006 15:29 schrieb abel deuring:
> Lutz wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 16. August 2006 18:58 schrieb abel deuring:
(...)
> The problem is that this error occurs
> quite early during the setup of the device structures. Perhaps you
> can simply comment out this call of TEST UNIT RE
Hello,
I am busy trying to get a brand new Epson Perfection 3490 PHOTO at work under
SANE.
I am running on Debian unstable, scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.18; backend
version 1.0.18.
One of the problems with this scanner are the many contradictory messages,
which sometimes
say that it is poss
Lutz wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 16. August 2006 18:58 schrieb abel deuring:
>>Lutz wrote:
>>>to me, it looks like that the (working) Epson scanner gives much more
>>>info than the canon does.
>>right: the Epson seems to be OK, while something is broken with the
>>FS2700, see below.
>>
>>>I already tried
I did test runs with the new canon.conf with my 2710F and everything
worked OK. I suspect there is a hardware error that causes the
sense_handler to take action. Perhaps it is a minor problem that
can be ignored?
Regards,
Ulrich Deiters
--
Prof. Dr. Ulrich K. Deiters __
Am Mittwoch, 16. August 2006 18:58 schrieb abel deuring:
> Lutz wrote:
> > to me, it looks like that the (working) Epson scanner gives much more
> > info than the canon does.
>
> right: the Epson seems to be OK, while something is broken with the
> FS2700, see below.
>
> > I already tried to debug
