On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 15:34 +0200, St?phane VOLTZ wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there was still a bug in "left position" detection. I fixed it
(in CVS) while
> improving sanei_search_reference_point(). Things should be better now.
>
> Regards,
> Stef
(Sorry, I'm resending this because I
I recently installed Suse 10.1 while the operating can detect the scanner it
does not supported it (no drivers) is there a way around this problem as I
did contact HP but they replied that they did no support Linux?
Thanks
Edryd
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scr
This is good information to have.
I'll try scanbuttond on my HP 5200C also and report the results.
front button wait never worked for me for HP 5200C in xsane (it just waited
forever). Button polling seemed to me to be hidden in
HPSCNMGR.DLL but nothing I did worked.
HP themselves recommended H
My device is capable of scanning images in different formats (jpeg, Tiff,
bmp ) depending on scan settings.
In what format the Frontend (eg. Xsane, I am using it for testing) expects
image data from backend? (raw or any of jpeg, Tiff, bmp)
Rupesh.
http://www.patni.com
World-Wide Partnerships.
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 15:20, ?tienne Bersac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > SANE standard 1 does not specify how to handle scanner buttons,
> > but it is clear, that an option, which deals with a button has to deliver
> > a value (button pressed or not). Regarding that requirement, you have either
> >
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, ?tienne Bersac wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> SANE standard 1 does not specify how to handle scanner buttons,
>> but it is clear, that an option, which deals with a button has to deliver
>> a value (button pressed or not). Regarding that requirement, you have either
>> to use SANE_TYPE_B
Hello,
> SANE standard 1 does not specify how to handle scanner buttons,
> but it is clear, that an option, which deals with a button has to deliver
> a value (button pressed or not). Regarding that requirement, you have either
> to use SANE_TYPE_BOOL or SANE_TYPE_INT - I choose BOOL.
> SANE_TYPE_
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, ?tienne Bersac wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> scanimage -L reports:
>> device `plustek:libusb:003:003' is a Canon N1220U USB flatbed scanner
>
> User should have
>
>bersace@celebrad:~$ scanimage -L
>device `plustek:libusb:002:002' is a Canon CanoScan N1220U flatbed
> sca
Hallo,
> According to your log, you have many backends enabled in dll.conf
Yes, that's right. I try'd that way AFTER Yast won't work for me :) . I
thought I deleted the self-compiled sane. But now I found at/usr/local/etc
another dll.conf an another Epson.conf. Now I deleted that stuff und
Instal
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 13:49, ?tienne Bersac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > scanimage -L reports:
> > device `plustek:libusb:003:003' is a Canon N1220U USB flatbed scanner
>
> User should have
>
> bersace@celebrad:~$ scanimage -L
> device `plustek:libusb:002:002' is a Canon CanoSca
Hello,
> Attached devices:
> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 03 Lun: 00
> Vendor: UMAX Model: Astra 1200S Rev: V2.9
> Type: Scanner ANSI SCSI revision: 02
> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 06 Lun: 00
> Vendor: MICROTEK Model: ScanMaker II Rev: 5.61
> Type:
Hello,
> scanimage -L reports:
> device `plustek:libusb:003:003' is a Canon N1220U USB flatbed scanner
User should have
bersace@celebrad:~$ scanimage -L
device `plustek:libusb:002:002' is a Canon CanoScan N1220U flatbed
scanner
Hello,
On Aug 9 12:24 Daniel Spannbauer wrote (shortened):
> if Yast would do his Job I don't have to set it up Manually. :)
According to your log, you have many backends enabled in dll.conf
which is not what we have in our sane package so that it looks
as if you use a self-compiled version of s
Hallo,
if Yast would do his Job I don't have to set it up Manually. :)
Now I've read the man-Pages but don't get forward.
I attached the scanimage.log after debugging.
Can anyboady figure out where the Problem is?
In dll.conf there is now an entry "epson".
Regards
Daniel Spannbauer
Johannes Me
> Hi,
> On 8/9/06, Johannes Meixner wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Aug 9 13:03 Parag N() wrote (shortened):
>> > With reference to Johannes Meixner's mail to this mailing list
>> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2006-August/017446.html,
>> > I have created a patch that will
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 10:55, Parag N() wrote:
> Hi,
> On 8/9/06, Johannes Meixner wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Aug 9 13:03 Parag N() wrote (shortened):
> > > With reference to Johannes Meixner's mail to this mailing list
> > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2
Hello,
On Aug 9 09:46 Daniel Spannbauer wrote (shortened):
> I'm trying to configure a Epson Perfection 1640 on the SCSI on SUSE 10.1 In
> my /etc/sane.d/epson.conf ist CSI enabled (scsi EPSON is written in there).
> Sane-find-scanner lists the scanner on /dev/sg1, but scanimage -L doesn't
> find
Hi,
as far as I know the scanner is not listed to be fully functional
with the driver.
There appear to be differences from the normal protocol that the device
expect. Best compare the i/o with the Windows driver and use the mailing
lists the next time since I can not answer all mails individuall
Hello
On Aug 9 00:59 Ulrich Deiters wrote (shortened):
> The undetected scanner is a Canoscan 2710S, an SCSI slide scanner.
First of all have a look at
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177492
To get (a lot of) debug messages use
---
Hi,
On 8/9/06, Johannes Meixner wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Aug 9 13:03 Parag N() wrote (shortened):
> > With reference to Johannes Meixner's mail to this mailing list
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2006-August/017446.html,
> > I have created a patch that will make sane-f
Hello,
On Aug 9 13:03 Parag N() wrote (shortened):
> With reference to Johannes Meixner's mail to this mailing list
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2006-August/017446.html,
> I have created a patch that will make sane-find-scanner not to detect
> Non-Scanner USB devices.
n.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060809/d1883920/sane-find-scanner.obj
From jsm...@suse.de Wed Aug 9 08:37:08 2006
From: jsm...@suse.de (Johannes Meixner)
Date: Wed Aug 9 08:37:34 2006
Subject: [sane-devel] Re: sane-find-scanner detects smartcard reader as
scanner
In-Rep
Hallo,
I'm trying to configure a Epson Perfection 1640 on the SCSI on SUSE 10.1 In
my /etc/sane.d/epson.conf ist CSI enabled (scsi EPSON is written in there).
Sane-find-scanner lists the scanner on /dev/sg1, but scanimage -L doesn't
find that scanner. What did I wrong?
Regards
Daniel
Daniel Span
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 17:28, ?tienne Bersac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I own a flatbed scanner Canon CanoScan N1220U. The device name is
> "plustek:libusb:002:002". I find some bug in that backend or at least in
> that device support.
>
> * The product name is "N1220U" instead of "CanoScan N12
Hi,
On 8/9/06, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Nick Papadonis wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Nick Papadonis wrote:
> >>> Is there an API to access button status? Specifically, Email, Fax,
> >>> Copy, OCR buttons? Additionally, is there an interface to modify the
> >>> LCD strin
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Nick Papadonis wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Nick Papadonis wrote:
>>> Is there an API to access button status? Specifically, Email, Fax,
>>> Copy, OCR buttons? Additionally, is there an interface to modify the
>>> LCD string?
> On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 13:55 -0400, m. allan noah
as root-
SANE_DEBUG_CANON=255 scanimage -L
do you see the canon backend produce any messages?
allan
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Ulrich Deiters wrote:
> The undetected scanner is a Canoscan 2710S, an SCSI slide scanner. It
> used to function properly with my previous computer (HP-UX). It does
> not ma
27 matches
Mail list logo
