[sane-devel] LiDE 500F: how to go further?

2006-05-12 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
tion starts? Then I can cut > the parts before ... There shouldn't be a lot of windows logs needed. Regards, Pierre -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: canon-500f.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 26419 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alio

[sane-devel] HP SCANJET 2400

2006-05-12 Thread Carlos Pereira
Hello All, I have a Hp ScanJet 2400, Windows XP sp2 and Ubuntu 5.10. I am available to do whatever testing is needed in relation to this scanner. I can program something too (C language), but I am a novice on device driver writing, and in linux in general. But if some generic programming is neede

[sane-devel] Umax Astra 4100:Genesys bakend development

2006-05-12 Thread Parag N(पराग़)
Hi, Anybody is working on developing a backend for UMAX Astra 4100 usb scanner?? It's having a Genesys GL646_HP chipset. Need Help in developing this backend. Here are those results that you people may want to look at My Results:- This scanner works only as root. sane-find-scanner can

[sane-devel] Fujitsu backend update 7

2006-05-12 Thread m. allan noah
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Il giorno ven, 05/05/2006 alle 00.51 -0400, m. allan noah ha scritto: >> I have released the next version of the updated fujitsu sane backend to my >> personal website. http://www2.pfeiffer.edu/~anoah/fujitsu/ >> >> up7 is a minor update to the up6 vers

[sane-devel] Fujitsu backend update 7

2006-05-12 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Il giorno ven, 05/05/2006 alle 00.51 -0400, m. allan noah ha scritto: > I have released the next version of the updated fujitsu sane backend to my > personal website. http://www2.pfeiffer.edu/~anoah/fujitsu/ > > up7 is a minor update to the up6 version (which works pretty well): [...] I just tri

[sane-devel] sane_cancel and sane_read

2006-05-12 Thread Wittawat Yamwong
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 19:44, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > [...] > Why not just kill the reader process in sane_cancel? Do you think the > way this is done in the existing backends (e.g. mustek) is wrong? I've implemented a reader process like mustek.c in my backend. Everything seems to work an