[sane-devel] Snapscan + Epson PF 3490

2005-11-09 Thread Oliver Schwartz
Hi, > I own an Epson Perfection 3490 and I am beginning to use it with > the CVS version of SANE (snapscan backend). While it seems to work > well at resolutions up to 1200 dpi (but I did not yet perform > really thorough testing), I noticed a kind of interlacing behaviour > when scanning negative

[sane-devel] Nikon LS50/5000

2005-11-09 Thread Spiro Angeli
Hi Henning and thank you for your reply. 1) > man scanimage > scanimage --help > scanimage -d coolscan2 > photo.pnm scanimage -L device `epson:libusb:001:002' is a Epson GT-9300 flatbed scanner device `coolscan2:usb:libusb:001:005' is a NikonLS-5000 ED film scanner So, the command wou

[sane-devel] plustek_dd garbage

2005-11-09 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 07:32:07PM +0100, jacek lempicki wrote: > I have to miss something, but I can't see any search > function in 'lists.alioth...' All links for the mailing lists: http://www.sane-project.org/mailing-lists.html > I've passed the test from testsuite ; it asked me to > inst

[sane-devel] Nikon LS50/5000

2005-11-09 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:48:13AM +0100, Spiro Angeli wrote: > > export SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_USB=4 > > export SANE_DEBUG_COOLSCAN2=255 > > scanimage > photo.pnm > > It all points to my Epson scanner even if both scanners are turned on. So, I > am not able to test it this way. Please provide mor

[sane-devel] Nikon LS50/5000

2005-11-09 Thread Spiro Angeli
Hi Ariel, Here are some answers: 1) Spiro > When I run Xsane, I get the option to choose between the two scanners I > have (Epson and Nikon) and get a new windows with default settings. > > I try to scan, and get this error: > Failed to start scanner: Error during device I/O Ariel >> i never saw

[sane-devel] Snapscan + Epson PF 3490

2005-11-09 Thread Levente Novák
I own an Epson Perfection 3490 and I am beginning to use it with the CVS version of SANE (snapscan backend). While it seems to work well at resolutions up to 1200 dpi (but I did not yet perform really thorough testing), I noticed a kind of interlacing behaviour when scanning negatives/diapositives