Fred Odendaal wrote:
> So, I'm thinking "I've got a degree in comp. sci. How difficult can it
> be to write a scanner driver?" I leaf through the sane documentation -
> looks simple enough! "Okay", I decide, "I'll do it!" Then I start
> looking for information about my scanner - a Lexmark X1185. I
First off, I apologize for my impatience. Caching the
calibration certainly makes a difference.
300 dpi 230x150mm grey scans, with the lamp left on and thus
warmup time set to zero:
no caching, full calibration:
1m12.999s
cache coarse:
57.469s
no calibration:
50.729s (and, indeed, ugly lines)
Wi
--Boundary-00=_KEpWCI2Tva37voZ
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi!
I've tested the backend again, with the changes from the weekend.
Here's the log:
--Boundary-00=_KEpWCI2Tva37voZ
Content-Type: application/x-tgz;
name="l
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 Jon Niehof wrote:
>I'm using scanimage in batch mode to scan books (at 300dpi, 8
>bit grey) on a Canon N670U (plustek backend, sane-backends
>1.0.15). Once the scan starts it's reasonably fast; however, the
>scan head spends quite a bit of time (maybe twenty seconds)
>futzing abo
Le lundi 11 avril 2005 =C3=A0 09:36 +0200, Gerhard Jaeger a =C3=A9crit :
> This should normally be done by the backends fine-calibration.
> Which SANE version are you using?
sane-backends 1.0.15, on Gentoo.
On Saturday 09 April 2005 01:54, NM Lists wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When I scan through sane+xsane, the images on my Canon Lide20 show a
> calibration problem; the left side of the image is much clearer than the
> right side. However, with the Canon drivers on Windows, after having hit
> the "calibrate
On Friday 08 April 2005 17:42, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > sorry for the late response.
> > These are the problems, that I've expected, when introducing this
> > feature. But I have no idea how to solve it!
>
> Well, disabling the locking if your check fails, in
