Hi,
Andreas Piening wrote:
> I'm realy impressed by the quick and helpful answers, thank you very
> much!
>
> I took a closer look at the Epson GT-3 and the Avision @V5100. The
> Problem I have with the Avision: It has many features that I don't need
> like the standalone connection to a pri
Hi,
Rene Rebe wrote:
> The Avision backend "only" supports SCSI and USB - there are no Avision
IEEE1394 / Firewire -^
> scanners in wide use (only one OEM model if I'm informed right).
Yours,
--
René Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Ger
Hi,
Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
>> The Other thing is: Which interface to choose? I need to engineer the
>> fastest solution possible, so I think SCSI is the fastest, am I right?
>> Is the sane-backend so "abstract" that it can handle the scanner at
>> USB/SCSI/FireWire or no matter what, or do I ne
Hi Rene, hi Karl Heinz,
I'm realy impressed by the quick and helpful answers, thank you very
much!
I took a closer look at the Epson GT-3 and the Avision @V5100. The
Problem I have with the Avision: It has many features that I don't need
like the standalone connection to a printer for copying
Rene Rebe writes:
> Hi,
>
> we should remove hpusbscsi from the Kernel. It is long obsolete and
> very unstable. I can send a patch for 2.4 and 2.6 (if needed) ;-)
>
> George Garvey wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 10:11:30PM -0800, Thomas Frayne wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>As far as I know, Rene h
Am Montag, 3. Januar 2005 20:15 schrieb Rene Rebe:
> Hi,
>
> we should remove hpusbscsi from the Kernel. It is long obsolete and very
> unstable. I can send a patch for 2.4 and 2.6 (if needed) ;-)
I was waiting for 2.7 to do that. The help file for the scanner carries
a big fat warning. Apparent
Hi,
Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
> If I remember correctly, duplex scanning is not (yet?) working. But I'm
> pretty sure that we can make it work with some effort. It's just that
> the demand for fully supporting this scanner was not that big.
The Avision backend implements at least the duplex mode
Hi,
Thomas Frayne wrote:
> What distribution did you switch to? How do you find it in comparison
> to Fedora?
http://www.exactcode.de/t2
Is quite nice (just some selfish PR here ;-). But designed for expert
use - so yet without graphical installer and such ... (But rock solid,
very up-to-
Hi,
Jens Westemeier wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I had the same problem with my SuSE 9.2 distribution. Recompiling the kernel
> without hpusbscsi might help. I left the kernel unchanged but entered the
Just removing the modules(s) from /lib/modules quickly solves the
problem without the need of a
Hi,
we should remove hpusbscsi from the Kernel. It is long obsolete and very
unstable. I can send a patch for 2.4 and 2.6 (if needed) ;-)
George Garvey wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 10:11:30PM -0800, Thomas Frayne wrote:
...
>As far as I know, Rene has made it pretty clear he doesn't w
On Jan 3, 2005, at 4:23 PM, Andreas Piening wrote:
> Hi Rene, hi Karl Heinz,
>
> [ ... ]
>
> The Other thing is: Which interface to choose? I need to engineer the
> fastest solution possible, so I think SCSI is the fastest, am I right?
> Is the sane-backend so "abstract" that it can handle the sca
I wrote:
>> My problem is that sane-find-scanner finds my
scanner,
>> but scanimage -L doesn't.
>> Also, after setting debug variables,
sane-find-scanner
>> shows debug output, but scanimage doesn't.
Henning responded:
> Yes, this will produce debug output. If it doesn't,
> your SANE installation
Hello all and thank you for your help. I am new to SANE, so please
forgive me if the answers to my questions are obvious; I read as much
documentation as I could, but still could not get it to work. I have a
USB HP ScanJet 3300C (sane-niash) and it is not found at all by sudo
sane-find-scanner
13 matches
Mail list logo
