Alle 16:18, gioved=EC 2 dicembre 2004, Michael Daum ha scritto:
> Hi Henning,
>
> I've got a mustek bearpawn 2448 cs plus scanner attached to
> the usb port. But it does not work.
>[...]
> dmesg says:
>
> usb 2-2: control timeout on ep0in
> usb 2-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd scanimage rqt
Hi,
On Thursday 02 December 2004 02:45, Jason Stahl wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> I am trying to get my Canon N1220U scanner working with sane-backends
> 1.0.15 on my laptop which is running Gentoo. I am having problem. Full
> details are at the following URL. Thanks for any help anyone can give.
>
> ht
On Thursday 02 December 2004 18:19, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:41:05AM +0100, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> > The 1250 works here with latest CVS and 1.0.15.
> > IDs: 04b8:010f
>
> This ID matches the one that is reported not to work with 1.0.15.
Yes I know - but I can't believe...
>
Hi,
Marcus Hufgard (Kalkwerk Hufgard GmbH) wrote:
> I use sane 1.0.15 on Linux compiled by source. I use the newest
> avision-sane backend 1.0 Build 106.
Ouhm - I'm currently in a process of reorganzation quite huge code
fragments to support new scanner modeles (including duplex scanning). I
ha
Hi!
i have the problem that i can't use my HP 7450c.
I use sane 1.0.15 on Linux compiled by source. I use the newest
avision-sane backend 1.0 Build 106.
sane-find scanner gets the following answer:
[root@w01glt03 sane-avision]# sane-find-scanner
# No SCSI scanners found. If you expected
--E75mJrUy8lRi9cGN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:41:05AM +0100, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> The 1250 works here with latest CVS and 1.0.15.
> IDs: 04b8:010f
This ID matches the one that is reported not to work with 1.0.15.
See comm
Hi Henning,
I've got a mustek bearpawn 2448 cs plus scanner attached to
the usb port. But it does not work.
I'm running a debian/testing system with
- 2.6.7-smp linux kernel
- sane 1.0.15-2
- libusb-0.1-4
The scanner is recognized by the first sane-find-scanner
and the first scanimage -L. But s
Oliver Rauch wrote:
> I suggest to keep it as USB function. Other bus systems may need
> different timeout values so it is better to use different functions for
> different connection types.
Right. Additionally, it might be reasonable to use different timeout
values for different USB devices, li
On Wednesday 01 December 2004 22:51, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > Tim Waugh wrote:
> >>Well this still seems to be affecting 1.0.15 even with the epson
> >>backend change. Commenting out the epson line in dll.conf makes
> >>things work; they don't work if the line is uncomment
Hi,
I wrote:
>> ADF + flatbed
>> USB 2.0 - ideal but not necessary, SCSI or usb 1.1 is
>> acceptable
>> Volume of 500 - 1000 pages per day
>
>
> I'm working on fixing all remaining issues to fully support the Avision
> AV220. I has this specs:
>
> Duplex
> ADF (no flatbed - sheetfeed)
> USB 2.
Hi,
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:54:59PM +0100, René Rebe wrote:
>
>>the default timeout passed to libusb of 30 seconds is quite a bit long.
>>So recovering from errors is already quite annoying for some use cases.
>>Now I have a situation where I expect an error t
11 matches
Mail list logo